rry about any confusion I may have
caused.
--
Jaime Kikpole
Network Administrator
Cairo-Durham Central School District
Technical Support:
h...@cairodurham.org
go.cairodurham.org/techtips
--
This electronic message and any attachment(s) may contain confidential or
legally privileged informat
There is a regular expression in RT_Config.pm. Look for it, read the
directions, and then make any needed adjustments in RT_SiteConfig.pm (not
RT_Config.pm.) Make sure that it matches the new email address and the old
one. It's important that it handle both, so that you can account for both
qr{^(?:rt(?:|-comment)\@its1\.cairodurham\.org)$}i);
Any idea what I missed?
Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.
--
Jaime Kikpole
Network Administrator
Cairo-Durham Central School District
Technical Support:
h...@cairodurham.org
go.cairodurham.org/techtips
--
This electronic message
I've seen plenty of reasons to use Custom Fields on tickets and have
done so for years. What I've never been able to figure out was: Why
use them on transactions?
For my technicians, adding CFs in the Comment or Reply screens makes
the most sense. We currently use CFs on the ticket (not transat
On Jun 15, 2012, at 5:14 AM, Michele Pinassi wrote:
> there's a way to have a "widget", in dahsboard, that shows all tickets
> owned by a group ?
I think that you could achieve that by building a search that achieves this and
then saving the search. The saved search can then be added to the das
On Jun 15, 2012, at 2:35 AM, Robert Wysocki wrote:
> Anyone, who worked on the ticket should leave a
> comment/reply, so you can obtain the list of people who worked on a
> ticket by parsing ticket transactions.
Is there a way to get a list of tickets based on who left comments? I didn't
see t
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Thomas Sibley wrote:
> "Logged in as ..." → Settings → About Me
Oh, sorry. Its currently set to "System Default".
Jaime
--
Network Administrator
Cairo-Durham Central School District
http://cns.cairodurham.org
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Thomas Sibley wrote:
> This is almost certainly because a) your user doesn't have a timezone
> set and your default is UTC, or b) your user has an incorrect timezone
> preference set.
Our email system is Google Apps for Education, so our email is
effectively Gmail
I've been using RT with various custom fields for years, but now its
time to re-model those custom fields a bit. I thought that at least
one of them, namely "Work By" (which includes a list of which
technicians worked on the ticket), should get moved to the transaction
level (vs. applying to the t
Since upgrading to RT 4.0.5, I've found that email being logged in my
RT instance and then displayed in the web GUI will have the wrong
time. More specifically, its off by the number of hours that my local
timezone is off from UTC. So if an email comes in at 10:21:58 -0400,
it will show the email
When using "make fixdeps", CPAN appears to hang on ExtUtil::MakeMaker.
I know very little about CPAN and installing these things by hand.
I've seen some advise on the web about disabling a line of code and
then the compile works, but I don't know where to find the source code
to modify. Nor do I
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Thomas Sibley wrote:
> No problem. Glad to hear you're upgrading. :) You may also be
> interested in
> http://blog.bestpractical.com/2011/07/upgrading-to-rt-4.html which also
> summarizes the things you should be aware of during an upgrade.
Thanks. I was assumi
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Thomas Sibley wrote:
> Going straight to 4.0.x is fine. There are a number of important
> database upgrade steps you need to do, so read all of the README and
> docs/UPGRADING-3.4, docs/UPGRADING-3.6, docs/UPGRADING-3.8,
> docs/UPGRADING-4.0 and docs/UPGRADING.mys
I'm currently using RT 3.4.5. I'd like to upgrade it. I was
wondering if I should just go straight to 4.0.x or go to 3.6, then
3.8, and then to 4.0. What would you suggest?
Thanks,
Jaime
--
Network Administrator
Cairo-Durham Central School District
http://cns.cairodurham.org
RT Train
ut this plan still requires us to go through every ticket and evaluate
them. So it feels very inefficient.
Any help or suggestions or even "RTFM page XX" would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
I have an old user, who was a Watcher on my "general" queue since
version 2.0.x (we're now running 3.4.x), who should not be receiving
messages any more. She still is receiving messages. I've looked at
the queue's Watcher list and the global Watcher list and she isn't
listed on either.
16 matches
Mail list logo