On 18 November 2013 20:44, Alex Vandiver wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 18:58 +1100, Samuel Leslie wrote:
>
> > [snip] Is it possible this is a bug/regression in RT v4.2.0 or have I
> > just overlooked or misunderstood something?
>
> Unfortunately, absolutely a regression
her field types behave as expected.
I've taken a look around the RT configuration but haven't made much
progress in determining the cause. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Is it possible this is a bug/regression in RT v4.2.0 or have I just
overlooked or misunderstood something?
Thanks,
Samuel Leslie
configuring it
per queue isn't ideal. Of course, we'd also want to do it in a way that
doesn't break any emails incoming using the "old form" if possible.
We're running RT 4.0.8 if this helps.
Thanks for any advice!
Kind regards,
Samuel Leslie
We're hiring! http://bestpractical.com/jobs
ut haven't found any that seemed to be a
sensible match for what I'm trying to achieve. Thanks again for the advice.
Kind regards,
Samuel Leslie
On 3 November 2011 01:54, Kevin Falcone wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 03:16:14PM +1100, Samuel Leslie wrote:
> >Does RT provi
ious; 95% of the
functionality seems to already exist, it's just that last step to make the
defined query the default that remains!
Best regards,
Samuel Leslie
RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Barcelona, Spain November 28 & 29, 2011
