Re: [rt-users] RT & Chinese Characters?

2010-11-23 Thread Vick Khera
On Nov 23, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Vivian Lee wrote: > I work with Brian at Trident Microsystems. The followings are the examples > of our issues. Hopefully, with the screen shots you would be able to see the > issues more clearly and could point us to the right direction to solve this > issue.

Re: [rt-users] RT & Chinese Characters?

2010-11-19 Thread Vick Khera
On Nov 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Brian Thompson wrote: > What do you mean by "using fonts without traditional glyphs in them"? What > we're seeing are square boxes in place of some of the characters. Would that > be a symptom of the font issue? Can you please point us to an example of a That's

Re: [rt-users] Can't locate Log/Dispatch.pm in @INC

2010-11-18 Thread Vick Khera
On Nov 18, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Ruslan Zakirov wrote: > It's mac_port's perl probably. So install apache and mod_perl/fastcgi > from ports as well and use them. Deja vu all over again... ;) Everything needs to be from the same package manager software (or manually built). Gets too confusing othe

Re: [rt-users] httpd2-prefork segfaulting on SLES11

2010-11-05 Thread Vick Khera
On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Brian Dial wrote: > mod_perl. fastcgi looked rather complicated so i was hoping to avoid that Here's the whole of our RT config in apache. First, install and enable the mod_fastcgi module in apache 2.2, then use the following, but adjust the file paths to match whe

Re: [rt-users] Why I am recommending 3.6 over 3.8 to my boss

2010-11-05 Thread Vick Khera
On Nov 5, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Josh Narins wrote: > They are never clobbered with: > > ./configure --prefix=/opt/local so now you need your own private copy of perl in /opt/local as well else the package system may clobber your perl modules installed by hand too. It becomes a very tangled we

Re: [rt-users] Why I am recommending 3.6 over 3.8 to my boss

2010-11-05 Thread Vick Khera
On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:26 AM, Robert Grasso wrote: > This is my own opinion : as you increase your Unix/Linux/RedHat skills, you > will feel less concerned by such issues. As you increase the number of systems you need to manage, you will feel more concerned by such issues. A good package manag

Re: [rt-users] RT for rt.support

2010-11-04 Thread Vick Khera
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Robbie Lankford wrote: > When first installed RT I failed to change 'rt.support' during the > installation. Now all of my tickets get 'rt.support' tagged into the subject, > as well as when I am logged in I see RT for rt.support in the top left hand > corner. I have

Re: [rt-users] schema change/warning in upgrade to RT3.8.8

2010-10-28 Thread Vick Khera
On Oct 27, 2010, at 8:17 PM, Kevin Falcone wrote: > You may be interested in sbin/rt-validator's output Wow. 5.5 hours later it deleted a fair number of dangling data rows. However, my two duplicated groupmembers rows are still there. What trouble will it cause to not be a unique index on tho

Re: [rt-users] schema change/warning in upgrade to RT3.8.8

2010-10-27 Thread Vick Khera
On Oct 27, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Vick Khera wrote: > Any recommendations on how to fix? It is hard to trace the schema relations > since there are not FK's defined, so I'm not sure how to update the group id > references or if I need to. Also, is this table supposed to be real

[rt-users] another useful index

2010-10-27 Thread Vick Khera
After our upgrade to 3.8.8 today, I spent some time to figure out why some things are still slow. Of particular note it was really really slow to reply to a specific correspondence on a ticket with lots of attachments. I noticed that RT was just spending all of that time waiting on this query:

[rt-users] schema change/warning in upgrade to RT3.8.8

2010-10-27 Thread Vick Khera
I *finally* got around to upgrading RT 3.6.7 to 3.8.8 today. Everything went smoothly except for one minor hiccup. The database schema upgrade for 3.8.3 failed with the following: [Wed Oct 27 13:06:01 2010] [crit]: DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR: relation "groupmembers1" already exists at