Re: [rt-users] 3.8.8 -> 4.0.1, PSGI upgrade/usage problem

2011-07-12 Thread Steve Huston
The solution was to replace the "Directory" directives with "Location" and make them URI relative; ie, , , etc. Assuming mailgate is OK with this too (I'll know shortly) this seems solved. -- Steve Huston - W2SRH - Unix Sysadmin, Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences Princeton University |ICBM

Re: [rt-users] 3.8.8 -> 4.0.1, PSGI upgrade/usage problem

2011-07-12 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 07/12/2011 01:18 PM, Steve Huston wrote: > On 7/12/11 1:13 PM, Thomas Sibley wrote: >> You should read docs/web_deployment.pod either from your RT 4 source >> tarball or >> https://github.com/bestpractical/rt/blob/stable/docs/web_deployment.pod. >> It has a number of sample configurations that

Re: [rt-users] 3.8.8 -> 4.0.1, PSGI upgrade/usage problem

2011-07-12 Thread Steve Huston
On 7/12/11 1:13 PM, Thomas Sibley wrote: > You should read docs/web_deployment.pod either from your RT 4 source > tarball or > https://github.com/bestpractical/rt/blob/stable/docs/web_deployment.pod. > It has a number of sample configurations that you should start from > rather than your RT 3 conf

Re: [rt-users] 3.8.8 -> 4.0.1, PSGI upgrade/usage problem

2011-07-12 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 07/12/2011 12:18 PM, Steve Huston wrote: > I've got everything up to the web services upgraded with no problems, > and here I'm having some trouble - I think I'd have had the same > troubles if this were 3.9, as I believe it's related to PSGI. My > apologies for the craptacular formatting of th

[rt-users] 3.8.8 -> 4.0.1, PSGI upgrade/usage problem

2011-07-12 Thread Steve Huston
I've got everything up to the web services upgraded with no problems, and here I'm having some trouble - I think I'd have had the same troubles if this were 3.9, as I believe it's related to PSGI. My apologies for the craptacular formatting of these errors. The error(s): [Tue Jul 12 12:01:01 201