I've confirmed that this is a bug. STANDALONE is defined as default
1, but never disabled when modperl2 or anything else is checked.
On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Jo Rhett wrote:
> I'm not trying to run RT standalone, why does it refuse to install
> due to missing standalone dependancies?
>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:22:19AM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> I've confirmed that this is a bug. STANDALONE is defined as default
> 1, but never disabled when modperl2 or anything else is checked.
We want it installed by default, as it's invaluable in debugging and
triage when your live, prod
On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:22:19AM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
>> I've confirmed that this is a bug. STANDALONE is defined as default
>> 1, but never disabled when modperl2 or anything else is checked.
>
> We want it installed by default, as it's in
> Doesn't RT doesn't have enough perl module bloat?
>
> And okay, I'll accept that answer if there was any documentation
> explaining both how this helps, and how to use it ourselves...
>
You'd do better at engaging with developers if you were a little less
combative.
___
On Jul 23, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
>> And okay, I'll accept that answer if there was any documentation
>> explaining both how this helps, and how to use it ourselves...
>
> You'd do better at engaging with developers if you were a little less
> combative.
I am trying to help. But
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:46:23PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Thanks for the great work so far, but please document this stuff so
> that we can help.
We'd love to have more help with documentation. If you're up for
updating the wiki with new information, we're always happy to answer
questions.
