On Jun 26, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Adriena Šišková wrote:
> I have same problem in RT3.8.2. a RTFM2.4.2
> Did this problem solved in RT3.8.3?
You don't say what problem you were experiencing.
RTFM 2.4.2 requires RT 3.8.3 in order to expose RTFM
in the SelfService UI.
-kevin
_
Hi,
I have same problem in RT3.8.2. a RTFM2.4.2
Did this problem solved in RT3.8.3?
Thank
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
Di
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Kevin Falcone
wrote:
> There have been bug fixes for this feature in svn
> These will be available in the RT3.8.3 release and the
> RTFM2.4.2 release. There is no set date for these
> releases at this time
>
> -kevin
ok, thanks for your answer.
I appreciate it,
On Mar 24, 2009, at 2:26 AM, Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Kevin Falcone wrote:
>> You should be looking for the release of RTFM2.4.2 and RT3.8.3
>
> With the obvious understanding of "when it is done", do you have any
> idea when you think this might occur?
> I'm asking becaus
On Mar 23, 2009, at 9:35 PM, Mr.Vandeley wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Kevin Falcone
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Mr Vandeley wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sorry to bother you but It would be really helpfull to get an
>>> answer to my question. Looking on previous list posts it se
On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Kevin Falcone wrote:
> You should be looking for the release of RTFM2.4.2 and RT3.8.3
With the obvious understanding of "when it is done", do you have any
idea when you think this might occur?
I'm asking because I was about to start on RTFM integration, but I'll
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Kevin Falcone
wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Mr Vandeley wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry to bother you but It would be really helpfull to get an
>> answer to my question. Looking on previous list posts it seems that
>> other people couldn't make this work neither.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Mr Vandeley wrote:
> I'm sorry to bother you but It would be really helpfull to get an
> answer to my question. Looking on previous list posts it seems that
> other people couldn't make this work neither. Old posts says that
> this feature wasn't fully functional.
>
Hi,
I'm sorry to bother you but It would be really helpfull to get an
answer to my question. Looking on previous list posts it seems that
other people couldn't make this work neither. Old posts says that
this feature wasn't fully functional.
So, please, this should work with just this instruction
