Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2011-04-29 Thread CALLEJA-ALBILLOS, FRANCK (FRANCK)** CTR **
practical.com Objet : Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:01:13AM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote: >However, if you're saying the format of the date itself (2010-11-15) is > wrong, then I am >wondering what it should be since our "Localiz

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-12 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:01:13AM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote: >However, if you're saying the format of the date itself (2010-11-15) is > wrong, then I am >wondering what it should be since our "LocalizedDate" format is -mm-dd. That is irrelevant. The module does not pay attention t

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-12 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Kevin, I'm sorry. I know I'm hard to deal with. We don't use timestamp on any of our dates. We just use dates. Our global system default is time=>0 in our date format: *Set($DateTimeFormat, {Format => 'LocalizedDate', Time => 0,}); *So when we want to set a date, we just want the date, hence "Due

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-12 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:27:16AM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote: >Are you saying the format I use for the date itself is wrong? Yes. Your format is wrong. I believe I've said that in each reply (I've snipped them below) -kevin > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Kevin Falcone > <[1]

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-12 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Kevin, My apologies. I thought I had been clear. I'm not seeing where the format is wrong. I looked at the Tools->Offline template and used that as a basis for my template. Due:followed by a date Are you saying the format I use for the date itself is wrong? Kenn LBNL On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:1

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-12 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:11:43AM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote: >Actually, I wasn't concerned with a timestamp. I'm more concerned with why > I'm getting an >error message even though the ticket fields are updated using > CommandByMail. That's why I >included the "debug" info in my l

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-12 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Kevin, Actually, I wasn't concerned with a timestamp. I'm more concerned with why I'm getting an error message even though the ticket fields are updated using CommandByMail. That's why I included the "debug" info in my last note. Do you have any ideas on where I can look for the problem? Kenn LBN

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-12 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:53:39PM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote: >[Thu Nov 11 21:38:58 2010] [warning]: Failed command 'due: 2010-11-28' > >My question is, can you think of how this might have happened or point me > in a direction to >look? This is not a Timestamp, it is a Date. A T

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-11 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Kevin, We ran some transactions with "debug" and this is what we got: Ok so here is the debug of the process: [Thu Nov 11 21:38:58 2010] [debug]: Converting 'ISO-8859-1' to 'utf-8' for text/plain - Subjectless message (/opt/rt3/bin/../lib/RT/I18N.pm:231) [Thu Nov 11 21:38:58 2010] [debug]: Conve

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-09 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:22:51PM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote: >I don't understand 'test suite' nor what 'timestamp' refers to. The module has a series of tests that are run before a release, and it passes. That test suite tests Due. A timestamp is a timestamp, what RT displays dates as by

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-09 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Kevin, I don't understand 'test suite' nor what 'timestamp' refers to. Kenn On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Kevin Falcone wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:25:57AM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote: > >To List, > > > >I'm using CommandByMail and I keep getting this error message, yet the

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-09 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:25:57AM -0800, Kenneth Crocker wrote: >To List, > >I'm using CommandByMail and I keep getting this error message, yet the > data is updated: > >Failed command 'due: 2010-11-28' >Error message: (no message) > >Due: 2010-11-28 > >The Duse was mo

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-09 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Jon, Actually, I have noticed a couple problems, especially for any Custom Fields defined as "Text" or "Wiki Text". Whether I use Gmail, Thunderbird, etc. it only manages to capture the first 76 characters. I think it needs to be re-worked for those type of CF's to capture all text until it runs i

Re: [rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-09 Thread Jon Davis
I don't have anything useful to contribute for an answer, other than "Me too". I have this exact same issue and I tried every format I could think of, nothing worked. Eventually I just gave up. If you figure it out, do let us know (please!) -Jon On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:25, Kenneth Crocker wr

[rt-users] Question on CommandByMail error

2010-11-09 Thread Kenneth Crocker
To List, I'm using CommandByMail and I keep getting this error message, yet the data is updated: Failed command 'due: 2010-11-28' Error message: (no message) Due: 2010-11-28 The Duse was modified, so why the error message? I tried this several times, ie. Due:11-26-2010; Due: 2010-11-28; Due