Thanks for the feedback guys, much apprecaited.
Todd Chapman wrote:
> I think the book is still as relevant as it was when it came out.
> That's not a review. Just saying it's not generally out of date,
> though the screenshots are out of date because of UI styling changes.
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2
I think the book is still as relevant as it was when it came out.
That's not a review. Just saying it's not generally out of date,
though the screenshots are out of date because of UI styling changes.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Libby wrote:
>
> I'm considering the RT Essentials book, t
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:30:33AM -0400, Andrew Libby wrote:
>
> I'm considering the RT Essentials book, though noticed it's
> publication date is in 2005. Thats almost 4 years old.
> I've been using RT about that long and I fear it's changed
> enough that the essentials book is not as relevant
I'm considering the RT Essentials book, though noticed it's
publication date is in 2005. Thats almost 4 years old.
I've been using RT about that long and I fear it's changed
enough that the essentials book is not as relevant as it
could be.
Can anyone weigh in on this?
Thanks.
Andy
--
=
