has no concept of a Ticket ID or number?
PK
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 June 2006 14:56
To: Philip Kime
Cc: Jason Fenner; RT users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
> It's the "fsck.com-rt" pa
> It's the "fsck.com-rt" part which is hard-coded in as the default. If
> you look in the DB table "Links", you'll see. I think that this scheme
> thing is very nice idea but I would have thought that the default would
> be better left at just "rt" so URIs would default to:
>
If you can get IANA
ing the default? I don't so I may move to an "rt" scheme
wholesale.
The patches to do this are simple and I can post them if there is any
interest.
PK
-Original Message-----
From: Jason Fenner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 June 2006 13:35
To: Philip Kime
Cc: Todd Chapman; R
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2006 15:47
To: Philip Kime
Cc: RT users
Subject: Re: [rt-users] The "fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
All tickets should have fsck.com-rt schemes. Why would that be a
problem?
-Todd
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
Will this URI
Ticket_Overlay.pm and URI.pm but in 3.6 REST interface, the links still
come out as fsck.com-rt so I've either missed something or something's
in the DB.
PK
-Original Message-
From: Todd Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2006 15:47
To: Philip Kime
Cc: RT users
Sub
All tickets should have fsck.com-rt schemes. Why would that be
a problem?
-Todd
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I
> remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't. I'm wondering if it's
> worth bothering
"fsck.com-rt-" URI scheme
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I
> remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't.
When did I say this?
___
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote:
> Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I
> remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't.
When did I say this?
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/
Will this URI scheme
thing be continued in later versions of RT? I remember JV saying that it
probably wouldn't. I'm wondering if it's worth bothering with generating patches
to get rid of the hard-coded "fsck.com-rt-" scheme because I need to use a lot
of REST calls making links etc. and ev
