Re: [rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread Jason Doran
SNI looks interesting. We set up this using a SAN cert and info from http://blog.revolunet.com/index.php/reseau/administration/hosting-multiple-ssl-vhosts-on-a-single-ipportcertificate-with-apache2 Regards, Jason On 21 Aug 2009, at 16:35, Jerrad Pierce wrote: > Hmm, actually it looks like Apach

Re: [rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread Jerrad Pierce
Hmm, actually it looks like Apache just picked up SNI a few months ago in 2.3 -- Cambridge Energy Alliance: Save money. Save the planet. ___ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com

Re: [rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread Jerrad Pierce
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:09, Curtis Bruneau wrote: > Each SSL site pretty much needs to be on it's own IP address, the > reasoning is the cert negotiation isn't name based header as apache > would. The only other way would be to have them on different ports but > then you'd have to specify the po

Re: [rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread testwreq wreq
I tried and the second one but still https://rt.hostname.com goes to https;//firstone While restarting apache, the warning message now was: [Fri Aug 21 11:20:23 2009] [warn] VirtualHost firstname:443 overlaps with VirtualHost rt.hostname.com:443, the first has precedence, perhaps you need a Name

Re: [rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread Drew Barnes
Try naming the virtual hosts. *:443 means any domain that resolves to that machine will get the first one, since it matches. Curtis may also be right (never tried two https sites on the same box), but try having the first one be and the second one and see if it works for you. On 8/21/09 11:1

Re: [rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread testwreq wreq
Actually, I should have mentioned before that our rt installation is on a different IP. On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Curtis Bruneau wrote: > Each SSL site pretty much needs to be on it's own IP address, the reasoning > is the cert negotiation isn't name based header as apache would. The onl

Re: [rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread Curtis Bruneau
Each SSL site pretty much needs to be on it's own IP address, the reasoning is the cert negotiation isn't name based header as apache would. The only other way would be to have them on different ports but then you'd have to specify the port when going to the site. testwreq wreq wrote: > * > I h

[rt-users] _default_ VirtualHost overlap on port 443, the first has precedence

2009-08-21 Thread testwreq wreq
* I have managed to get it all set up and RT running OK with named virtual host over http. However, I am having problems with getting them to work over https. When I set a virtual host name, it always serves the first listed domain. See settings below. https:firstone serves the correct folder, but