On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
Jesse, how would you feel about having an action which indicates
an update
not by a privileged user?
Ie, Correspond and Comments would be from privileged.
Update or Response (or any other name you like) would be an
update
from
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:40:33 -0500, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com
wrote:
On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
RT::Transaction-IsInbounda
So I figured I'd test this out. It wasn't working, so I dug around
inside RT/Transact.pm and I can't find this function. Is this
We already have something for you, I think.
RT::Transaction-IsInbounda
So I figured I'd test this out. It wasn't working, so I dug around
inside RT/Transact.pm and I can't find this function. Is this going
into 3.8.3 or 4.0 ?
Sorry. the a at the end was a typo. It's been there
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Stephen Turner wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:40:33 -0500, Jo Rhett
jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
RT::Transaction-IsInbounda
So I figured I'd test this out. It wasn't working, so I dug around
inside
On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
We already have something for you, I think.
RT::Transaction-IsInbounda
=head2 IsInbound
Returns true if the creator of the transaction is a requestor of the
ticket.
Returns false otherwise
By a requestor I take it to mean anyone other than
Jesse, how would you feel about having an action which indicates an
update not by a privileged user?
Ie, Correspond and Comments would be from privileged.
Update or Response (or any other name you like) would be an update
from an unprivileged user.
This kind of change would make it easy to
