On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Kevin Falcone wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:02:35PM -0400, Andrew Cobaugh wrote:
> >Is there no clean way around memory leaks in RT when using
> mod_fastcgi short of HUPing the
> >individual rt-server.fcgi processes when they reach a certain size?
> >
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:02:35PM -0400, Andrew Cobaugh wrote:
>Is there no clean way around memory leaks in RT when using mod_fastcgi
> short of HUPing the
>individual rt-server.fcgi processes when they reach a certain size?
>Running 4.0.13 right now. With a load balancer in front hi
Hey folks,
Is there no clean way around memory leaks in RT when using mod_fastcgi
short of HUPing the individual rt-server.fcgi processes when they reach a
certain size?
Running 4.0.13 right now. With a load balancer in front hitting a simple
html page located at /rt/NoAuth/LoadBalancer.html ever
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:24:56PM -0400, Mathieu Longtin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have RT 3.8.1 installed with mod_perl 2.0.4 on a Red Hat ES5 system, and
> using Oracle as a database.
>
> I have noticed a lot of memory leaks on the part of the apache processes. It
> seems they grow by 2 to 5K for
Hi,
we have RT 3.8.1 installed with mod_perl 2.0.4 on a Red Hat ES5 system, and
using Oracle as a database.
I have noticed a lot of memory leaks on the part of the apache processes. It
seems they grow by 2 to 5K for every page request against RT, and about 10K
for every email loaded by rt-mailgat
