On Tue 17.Mar'09 at 11:33:35 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Jesse, I now have some time to dig into the code and/or docs. Have you
> already tackled this, or would a patch be welcome?
I'd love the patch.
-jesse
pgpZTEQnBaIah.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Jesse, I now have some time to dig into the code and/or docs. Have
you already tackled this, or would a patch be welcome?
On Jan 27, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> Following up on my own post:
>
> RFC 2822, 3.6:
> ...for the purposes of this standard, header fields SHOULD NOT be
>
