Re: [rt-users] reply via email from AdminCC does not go to Requestor

2008-08-05 Thread チャンドラ
Hi, Just so the record is complete, it turned out the problem was with the mailing list application that I was using to forward mail into RT, and not RT itself. I don't know exactly what was happening, but I suspect some header information that RT was expecting was not there, or was in an

[rt-users] reply via email from AdminCC does not go to Requestor

2008-07-30 Thread チャンドラ
Hi everybody, I am running a new installation of RT3.6, and most things work fine except for the following: A new user can send a mail to RT and properly get automatically registered, and the AdminCCs get the new ticket notify sent to them. If an AdminCC (or owner) uses the UI to reply, the

Re: [rt-users] reply via email from AdminCC does not go to Requestor

2008-07-30 Thread Stephen Turner
At 7/30/2008 03:53 AM, =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJUElYyVzJUklaRsoQg==?= wrote: Hi everybody, I am running a new installation of RT3.6, and most things work fine except for the following: A new user can send a mail to RT and properly get automatically registered, and the AdminCCs get the new ticket

Re: [rt-users] reply via email from AdminCC does not go to Requestor

2008-07-30 Thread Sven Sternberger
Hello! On Mi, 2008-07-30 at 16:53 +0900, チャンドラ wrote: A new user can send a mail to RT and properly get automatically registered, and the AdminCCs get the new ticket notify sent to them. If an AdminCC (or owner) uses the UI to reply, the Requestor is properly sent a mail. However, if an

Re: [rt-users] reply via email from AdminCC does not go to Requestor

2008-07-30 Thread マーティン
Hi Sven, Thank you very much for responding. A new user can send a mail to RT and properly get automatically registered, and the AdminCCs get the new ticket notify sent to them. If an AdminCC (or owner) uses the UI to reply, the Requestor is properly sent a mail. However, if an AdminCC

Re: [rt-users] reply via email from AdminCC does not go to Requestor

2008-07-30 Thread マーティン
Hi Steve, Thanks for the response! Scrip 5 should be taking care of sending reply mail back to the requestor. In the logs, I get the much discussed message: Sounds like the messages coming in from AdminCcs are comments rather than replies. This could be simply because AdminCcs are replying