Re: [rt-users] First Impressions of RT V3.6.0rc2

2006-05-24 Thread Vivek Khera
On May 24, 2006, at 11:23 AM, Nick Metrowsky wrote:On installation, the install required installing two perl CPAN modules and it failed to do it via “make fixdeps”, so I had to do them by hand. Not a big deal. The rest of the install/upgrade went flawlessly. Let’s just say it was much easier to go

RE: [rt-users] First Impressions of RT V3.6.0rc2

2006-05-24 Thread Joshua Colson
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 11:16 -0500, Duncan Shannon wrote: > >Logging in, frankly I like the user interface to 3.4.4 better, I think > the >lack of shading and borders causes a lot more eye strain, > especially on an > > Does anyone have any screen shots of the new interface handy? Im quite > excit

RE: [rt-users] First Impressions of RT V3.6.0rc2

2006-05-24 Thread Duncan Shannon
>Logging in, frankly I like the user interface to 3.4.4 better, I think the >lack of shading and borders causes a lot more eye strain, especially on an Does anyone have any screen shots of the new interface handy? Im quite excited to see it. duncan ___

RE: [rt-users] First Impressions of RT V3.6.0rc2

2006-05-24 Thread Nick Metrowsky
rmation Company http://www.digitalglobe.com - -Original Message- From: Jesse Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:25 AM To: Nick Metrowsky Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject:

Re: [rt-users] First Impressions of RT V3.6.0rc2

2006-05-24 Thread Jesse Vincent
> > I did not do an extensive test like create tickets, manipulate assets, > etc, but I did a cursory look at the software. All in all this looks > like a great upgrade, but I would give folks the option to keep the > 3.4.4 style interface or use the interface introduced in 3.6.0rc2. We've don