Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035

2017-01-04 Thread leisaswenson via rtc-linux
On Thu, 1/5/17, fullergita via rtc-linux wrote: Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035 To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, January 5, 2017, 6:08 AM

Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035

2017-01-04 Thread fullergita via rtc-linux
On Thu, 1/5/17, bishopcharles556 via rtc-linux wrote: Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035 To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, January 5, 2017, 5:55 AM

Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035

2017-01-04 Thread bishopcharles556 via rtc-linux
On Thu, 1/5/17, stevegreen472 via rtc-linux wrote: Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035 To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, January 5, 2017, 2:52 AM

Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035

2017-01-04 Thread stevegreen472 via rtc-linux
On Thu, 1/5/17, denniseburnett via rtc-linux wrote: Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035 To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, January 5, 2017, 2:06 AM

Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035

2017-01-04 Thread denniseburnett via rtc-linux
On Thu, 1/5/17, bret.ng via rtc-linux wrote: Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035 To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Date: Thursday, January 5, 2017, 12:40 AM

Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035

2017-01-04 Thread bret.ng via rtc-linux
On Wed, 1/4/17, Alexandre Belloni wrote: Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035 To: "Ryan Jones" Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Date: Wednesday, January 4, 2017, 11:57

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] rtc: rx8010: change lock mechanism

2017-01-04 Thread Alexandre Belloni
On 20/12/2016 at 09:42:44 +0100, Fabien Lahoudere wrote : > Remove spinlock and use the "rtc->ops_lock" from RTC subsystem instead. > spin_lock_irqsave() is not needed here because we do not have hard IRQs. > > This patch fixes the following issue: > > root@GE004097290448 b850v3:~# hwclock

Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add support for RX4035

2017-01-04 Thread Alexandre Belloni
Hi, Sorry for the late review! On 05/08/2016 at 11:54:36 -0600, Ryan Jones wrote : > + * Based on: > + * drivers/rtc/rtc-rx4581.c I'd argue that it doesn't really matter ;) > +#define RX4035_REG_SC0x00 /* Second in BCD */ > +#define RX4035_REG_MN0x01 /* Minute

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: armada38x: add __ro_after_init to armada38x_rtc_ops

2017-01-04 Thread Kees Cook
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:23:41PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: >> Basically, the strategy of the patch is that one may consider it >> preferable to duplicate the structure for the different alternatives, >>

[rtc-linux] الدورة التدريبية تكنولوجيا الإدارة الذكية التحول من الإدارة الإلكترونية الى الإدارة الذكية إدارة المستقبل والخدمات الذكية دبى – الامارات العربية المتحدة )Smart technology management) خلال

2017-01-04 Thread sara dar
*الدار العربية للتنمية الإدارية* *بالتعاون مع الإتحاد الدولى لمؤسسات التنمية البشرية* *الدورة التدريبية * *تكنولوجيا الإدارة الذكية * *التحول من الإدارة الإلكترونية الى الإدارة الذكية * *إدارة المستقبل والخدمات الذكية * *دبى – الامارات العربية المتحدة * *)**Smart technology management)*

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: armada38x: add __ro_after_init to armada38x_rtc_ops

2017-01-04 Thread Julia Lawall
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:23:41PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > Basically, the strategy of the patch is that one may consider it > > preferable to duplicate the structure for the different alternatives, > > rather than use __ro_after_init.

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: armada38x: add __ro_after_init to armada38x_rtc_ops

2017-01-04 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:23:41PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > Basically, the strategy of the patch is that one may consider it > preferable to duplicate the structure for the different alternatives, > rather than use __ro_after_init. Perhaps if the structure were larger, > then __ro_after_init

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: armada38x: add __ro_after_init to armada38x_rtc_ops

2017-01-04 Thread Julia Lawall
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:43:32PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > The question was whether the point to the rtc_class_ops could be made > > > __ro_after_init. And Russell is right, it is pointed to by the ops > > > pointer in a struct

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: armada38x: add __ro_after_init to armada38x_rtc_ops

2017-01-04 Thread Julia Lawall
> The question was whether the point to the rtc_class_ops could be made > __ro_after_init. And Russell is right, it is pointed to by the ops > pointer in a struct rtc_device and that struct is dynamically allocated > in rtc_device_register(). OK, I think it's a terminology issue. You mean the

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: armada38x: add __ro_after_init to armada38x_rtc_ops

2017-01-04 Thread Alexandre Belloni
On 04/01/2017 at 11:57:00 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote : > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:31:18PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 01:18:29PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 6:06

[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: armada38x: add __ro_after_init to armada38x_rtc_ops

2017-01-04 Thread Julia Lawall
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:31:18PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 01:18:29PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux > > > wrote: > >