Hi Friends, Greetings for the day, Please find the list of skilled
R2Technologies LLC consultants who are actively looking for new role and
please share your requirements to ra...@r2techcorp.com
S.No
CANDIDATE SKILL SET EXPERIENCE LOCATION RELOCATION
1 Syed .Net Developer 8+ Plano,TX YES
2 Su
Hi!
> > > Or not, having an RTC set in the past is actually quite common. I'd find
> > > it weird to have a new device boot and be set to a date in the future.
> >
> > ...but still better than board stuck in the past, no?
> >
> > > Also note that the threshold or offset thing may seem like a goo
-functions/20170621-044455
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git
rtc-next
config: i386-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All
Hi Friends, Greetings for the day, Please find the list of skilled
R2Technologies LLC consultants who are actively looking for new role and
please share your requirements to ra...@r2techcorp.com
S.No
CANDIDATE SKILL SET EXPERIENCE LOCATION RELOCATION
1 Syed .Net Developer 8+ Plano,TX YES
2 Su
Hi Friends,
Greetings for the day, Please find the list of skilled R2Technologies
consultants who are actively looking for new role and please share your
requirements to ra...@r2techcorp.com
*CANDIDATE* *SKILL SET* *EXPERIENCE * *LOCATION* *RELOCATION* *VISA*
*Syed* *.Net Developer* *8+* *Plano,T
On 21/06/2017 at 08:34:43 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > I think tglx had a plan for offsetting the time at some point so
> > > > > 32-bit
> > > > > platform can pass 2038 properly.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, but there are still quite some issues to solve there:
> > > >
> > > > 1)
Hi!
> > > > I think tglx had a plan for offsetting the time at some point so 32-bit
> > > > platform can pass 2038 properly.
> > >
> > > Yes, but there are still quite some issues to solve there:
> > >
> > > 1) How do you tell the system that it should apply the offset in the
> > >
On 21/06/2017 at 10:19:49 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:39:07AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 21/06/2017 at 09:51:52 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > If someone uses different threshold, well, there will be
> > > confusion. But only for users that have
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:26:51AM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux
> > Sent: 20 June 2017 22:16
> ..
> > Consider that at the moment, we define the 32-bit RTC representation to
> > start at a well known epoch. We _could_ decide that when it wraps to
> > 0x8000 secon
From: Russell King - ARM Linux
> Sent: 20 June 2017 22:16
..
> Consider that at the moment, we define the 32-bit RTC representation to
> start at a well known epoch. We _could_ decide that when it wraps to
> 0x8000 seconds, we'll define the lower 0x4000 seconds to mean
> dates in the futur
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:39:07AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 21/06/2017 at 09:51:52 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > If someone uses different threshold, well, there will be
> > confusion. But only for users that have their rtc set to the past,
> > which is quite unusual.
> >
>
> Or not,
2017-06-21 0:08 GMT+02:00 Pavel Machek :
> Hi!
>
>> >> > This is it.
>> >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6219401/
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, that's argument against changing rtc _drivers_ for hardware that
>> >> can not do better than 32bit. For generic code (such as 44/51 sysfs,
>
On 21/06/2017 at 09:51:52 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > I agree with that but not the android guys. They seem to mandate an RTC
> > > that can store time from 01/01/1970. I don't know much more than that
> > > because they never cared to explain why that was actually necessary
> > > (ap
Hi!
> > I agree with that but not the android guys. They seem to mandate an RTC
> > that can store time from 01/01/1970. I don't know much more than that
> > because they never cared to explain why that was actually necessary
> > (apart from a laconic "this will result in a bad user experience")
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
