On 11/14/2013 6:06 PM, Maldonado, Sergio E. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a user of RTEMS 4.10.99 and would like to exercise the parameter
> CONFIGURE_HAS_OWN_CONFIGURATION_TABLE as specified in 23.14.2 of the RTEMS C
> User's Guide (24 Feb 2013).
>
> When this parameter is defined, how should a user
Hello,
I'm a user of RTEMS 4.10.99 and would like to exercise the parameter
CONFIGURE_HAS_OWN_CONFIGURATION_TABLE as specified in 23.14.2 of the RTEMS C
User's Guide (24 Feb 2013).
When this parameter is defined, how should a user instantiate the
rtems_configuration_table structure for use by
On 2013-11-14 16:10, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 11/14/2013 9:06 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>On 2013-11-14 15:58, Jennifer Averett wrote:
>>Line 64 of the last cpuset that was sent out:
>>
>>/* Define the cpu set structure */
>>typedef struct _cpuset {
>>cpu_set_word_t __bits[_NCPUWORDS];
>>} c
On 11/14/2013 9:06 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 2013-11-14 15:58, Jennifer Averett wrote:
>> Line 64 of the last cpuset that was sent out:
>>
>> /* Define the cpu set structure */
>> typedef struct _cpuset {
>>cpu_set_word_t __bits[_NCPUWORDS];
>> } cpu_set_t;
>
> Ok, this is the Linux nami
On 2013-11-14 15:58, Jennifer Averett wrote:
Line 64 of the last cpuset that was sent out:
/* Define the cpu set structure */
typedef struct _cpuset {
cpu_set_word_t __bits[_NCPUWORDS];
} cpu_set_t;
Ok, this is the Linux naming. FreeBSD uses cpuset_t:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?qu
Line 64 of the last cpuset that was sent out:
/* Define the cpu set structure */
typedef struct _cpuset {
cpu_set_word_t __bits[_NCPUWORDS];
} cpu_set_t;
-- Jennifer
> -Original Message-
> From: rtems-devel-boun...@rtems.org [mailto:rtems-devel-
> boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Sebast
On 2013-11-14 15:00, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Subject say it. I would like to submit that file
by itself as a patch so Jennifer can commit the
tests for it and we can use it to add affinity
to the Classic API while the POSIX side settles out
from the discussions.
I think the code is ready.
Thoughts
Sure.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Subject say it. I would like to submit that file
> by itself as a patch so Jennifer can commit the
> tests for it and we can use it to add affinity
> to the Classic API while the POSIX side settles out
> from the discussions.
>
Hi
Subject say it. I would like to submit that file
by itself as a patch so Jennifer can commit the
tests for it and we can use it to add affinity
to the Classic API while the POSIX side settles out
from the discussions.
I think the code is ready.
Thoughts?
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.
