On 11/26/2013 3:30 PM, Claus, Ric wrote:
> This is something that I’ve been interested in and working on for awhile now.
> In particular, I’ve been trying to build iperf using RTEMS tools for the
> ARM Cortex-A9 (targeting a Zynq based eval board), but am not getting very
> far. The compile d
This is something that I’ve been interested in and working on for awhile now.
In particular, I’ve been trying to build iperf using RTEMS tools for the ARM
Cortex-A9 (targeting a Zynq based eval board), but am not getting very far.
The compile dies on lacking a definition for the int64_t type,
Hi
This should be closer than the version you posted
on Melange. I added printf's to help show where
the context switches from one thread to another
were occurring. See if you can follow what is
going on.
Remember the test description is:
pthread_setschedparam - lower own priority, preempt
whi
On 11/26/2013 2:23 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Does it make sense to have separate methods for the validation of the
> different cases? I would think the usage would be "err =
> validate(cpuset *s);" which could be propagated through the return
> value regardless of the condition?
I don't know. That
Does it make sense to have separate methods for the validation of the
different cases? I would think the usage would be "err =
validate(cpuset *s);" which could be propagated through the return
value regardless of the condition?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
> And in cas
And in case the error cases are not completely clear,
do a "man pthread_setaffinity_np" on Linux and see
the errors returned. :)
On 11/26/2013 1:15 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> FWIW these are likely three separate methods. We may
> need a new handler. So think long term when making
> suggestions.
FWIW these are likely three separate methods. We may
need a new handler. So think long term when making
suggestions.
On 11/26/2013 1:11 PM, Jennifer Averett wrote:
> I’d like to add a method to the super core to validate
>
> a cpuset:
>
> 1) Can’t have a cpuset that is sets a cpu greater t
I'd like to add a method to the super core to validate
a cpuset:
1) Can't have a cpuset that is sets a cpu greater than the number of cores
2) Can't have a cpuset that is sets a cpu that is turned off or not
running rtems...
3) Can't have a cpuset with no cpu's selected.
Any s
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/leon3/console/console.c | 170 ++--
1 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/leon3/console/console.c
b/c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/leon3/console/console.c
index 1b1882d..0b30369 100644
--- a/c/src/lib/libbsp
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/leon3/console/console.c | 62 +---
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/leon3/console/console.c
b/c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/leon3/console/console.c
index 0b30369..1860e5c 100644
--- a/c/src/lib/libbsp
Move declaration of global variables and functions to header
file. Make several global variables and functions static.
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/leon3/console/console.c | 73
.../libbsp/sparc/leon3/console/printk_support.c| 14 +---
c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/leon3/
11 matches
Mail list logo
