Below are the results from running 2 and 4 cores using grsim against the head.
I
smpunsupported01
2 Core: Runs
4 Core: Runs
smp08
2 Core: Program doesn't return to grsim at end - Core 0:
_Per_CPU_Wait_for_state from rtems_shutdown_executive
On 2014-02-05 17:34, Joel Sherrill wrote:
This is redundant with rtems_status_text() which has been in the tree for
years. Chris wrote this years ago cpukit/libcsupport/src/error.c
Its a matter of taste if you consider this as redundant. I think its an
alternative.
The rtems_status_text()
This is redundant with rtems_status_text() which has been in the tree for
years. Chris wrote this years ago cpukit/libcsupport/src/error.c
It does not appear to be in the user's guide but I have included it in the
class for as long as I can remember.
It is referenced in 36 files in the source tr
---
cpukit/rtems/Makefile.am |1 +
cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/status.h | 10 +++
cpukit/rtems/src/statusdesc.c | 69
doc/user/Makefile.am | 11 ++-
doc/user/dirstat.t
Hello Jennifer,
I fixed some LEON3 SMP initialization bugs today. Would you mind testing with
the latest RTEMS master? On a real NGMP board all tests pass.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49
Hi.
In current code mpc5200_psc_isOn() function always return false.
Patch should be the following:
diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/gen5200/console/console.c
b/c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/gen5200/console/console.c
index a70e06d..5740b5b 100644
--- a/c/src/lib/libbsp/powerpc/gen5200/console/
The _CPU_Context_switch() is a normal function call. The following
registers are volatile (the caller must assume that the register
contents are destroyed by the callee) according to "SYSTEM V APPLICATION
BINARY INTERFACE - SPARC Processor Supplement", Third Edition: g1, o0,
o1, o2, o3, o4, o5. D
On 2014-02-05 10:17, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/05/2014 09:01 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2014-02-04 18:50, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/04/2014 04:13 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
we have to define the tool chain versions intended for RTEMS 4.11.
For Binutils I would like to use relea
On 02/05/2014 09:01 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2014-02-04 18:50, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/04/2014 04:13 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
we have to define the tool chain versions intended for RTEMS 4.11.
For Binutils I would like to use release 2.24 with the attached patch.
For GCC we
On 2014-02-04 18:50, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/04/2014 04:13 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
we have to define the tool chain versions intended for RTEMS 4.11.
For Binutils I would like to use release 2.24 with the attached patch.
For GCC we should use a recent 4.8 branch snapshot (e.g.
f
10 matches
Mail list logo
