On 2014-02-21 02:55, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>I would prefer to see symmetry between our choice to use cpu_set_t as
>>the opaque type for the cpu bit sets. Thus I recommend using the score
>>name _Cpu_set for the handler. (It is unfortunate that we can't use
>>_CPU_set because that would clash with
On 2014-02-21 01:31, Chris Johns wrote:
On 21/02/2014 3:31 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Chris,
On 2014-02-20 03:50, Chris Johns wrote:
On 20/02/2014 12:42 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
+/**
+ * @brief State of a processor.
+ *
+ * @dot
+ * digraph states {
+ * bi [label="PER_CPU_STATE_BEFO
On 2014-02-20 18:36, Gedare Bloom wrote:
What RTEMS configure and BSPs do you test this on?
My configure options are
--enable-posix --enable-smp --enable-tests --enable-cxx --enable-networking
I test on SPARC LEON4 (NGMP is a four processor board), on PowerPC P1020RDB
(two processor board) a
I'd like a plan for removing the checks. Perhaps each release cycle
should sweep up these feature checks as the tools get stabilized?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
> On 2/20/2014 3:12 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> Do we do this with other newlib features?
> Various configur
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
> On 2/20/2014 3:11 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> I mostly focused on the 0002-score... file. The others seemed ok at a
>> glance... with respect to the 0002 patch I have the following:
>>
>> Copyright should only be applied to code from the tim
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
> On 2/20/2014 4:45 PM, Peter Dufault wrote:
>> On Feb 20, 2014, at 16:11 , Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>>> +#if __RTEMS_HAVE_SYS_CPUSET_H__
>>> I think we decided to prefer the more explicit "#if defined(...)" for
>>> checking for CPP defines.
>
On 21/02/2014 3:31 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Chris,
On 2014-02-20 03:50, Chris Johns wrote:
On 20/02/2014 12:42 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
+/**
+ * @brief State of a processor.
+ *
+ * @dot
+ * digraph states {
+ * bi [label="PER_CPU_STATE_BEFORE_INITIALIZATION"];
+ * rsm [label="PE
On 2/20/2014 4:45 PM, Peter Dufault wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2014, at 16:11 , Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>> +#if __RTEMS_HAVE_SYS_CPUSET_H__
>> I think we decided to prefer the more explicit "#if defined(...)" for
>> checking for CPP defines.
>> Also, what is this define checking against / where is it defi
On Feb 20, 2014, at 16:11 , Gedare Bloom wrote:
> +#if __RTEMS_HAVE_SYS_CPUSET_H__
> I think we decided to prefer the more explicit "#if defined(...)" for
> checking for CPP defines.
> Also, what is this define checking against / where is it defined?
I think "#if defined()" isn't more explicit
On 2/20/2014 3:11 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I mostly focused on the 0002-score... file. The others seemed ok at a
> glance... with respect to the 0002 patch I have the following:
>
> Copyright should only be applied to code from the time it is written.
> We should avoid copy-paste and extending co
On 2/20/2014 3:12 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Do we do this with other newlib features?
Various configure.ac's have these type of tests in them. I know we
have code which uses them. It is likely other tests do as well.
We are trying to ease the bump with older tools and minimize the
risk that git b
Do we do this with other newlib features?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Jennifer Averett
wrote:
>
> The attached patch adds the check for cpuset.h in newlib
> into the cpuset test.
>
> Jennifer Averett
> On-Line Applications Research
> ___
> rtems-de
I mostly focused on the 0002-score... file. The others seemed ok at a
glance... with respect to the 0002 patch I have the following:
Copyright should only be applied to code from the time it is written.
We should avoid copy-paste and extending copyright into the past.
fix the license address as r
The attached patch adds the check for cpuset.h in newlib
into the cpuset test.
Jennifer Averett
On-Line Applications ResearchFrom 2bbd8fb24aa8a9393d3b11455400cb823253f80a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jennifer Averett
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:51:01 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/19] sptests: Add chec
Attached is a set of patches for review that implement classic affinity.
Jennifer Averett
On-Line Applications ResearchFrom e950c2191bc05f9d60afda99f6529360ae03670b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jennifer Averett
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:42:24 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 02/19] score: Add cpuset suppo
What RTEMS configure and BSPs do you test this on?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Rename _SMP_Request_other_cores_to_perform_first_context_switch() into
> _SMP_Request_start_multitasking() since this requests now a multitasking
> start on all configured and available p
Rename _SMP_Request_other_cores_to_perform_first_context_switch() into
_SMP_Request_start_multitasking() since this requests now a multitasking
start on all configured and available processors. The name corresponds
_Thread_Start_multitasking() and
_SMP_Start_multitasking_on_secondary_processor() a
On 2/20/2014 2:45 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 2014-02-19 17:33, Jennifer Averett wrote:
>> Module:rtems
>> Branch:master
>> Commit:52eecbaa089523a4afaef1024225c7bf5181495e
>> Changeset:http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=52eecbaa089523a4afaef1024225c7bf5181495e
>>
>> Author:J
On 2014-02-19 17:33, Jennifer Averett wrote:
Module:rtems
Branch:master
Commit:52eecbaa089523a4afaef1024225c7bf5181495e
Changeset:http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=52eecbaa089523a4afaef1024225c7bf5181495e
Author:Jennifer Averett
Date: Wed Feb 19 10:36:01 2014 -0600
posi
19 matches
Mail list logo
