Re: TCP/IP update, possible SMP (GSOC 2014)

On 2014-03-03 08:30, Daniel Ramirez wrote: On Mar 3, 2014 1:13 AM, "Sebastian Huber" mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote: > > On 2014-02-28 17:09, Daniel Ramirez wrote: >> >> Work that needs to be done within the scheduler API that would enable SMP. >> >> >> The

Re: TCP/IP update, possible SMP (GSOC 2014)

On Mar 3, 2014 1:13 AM, "Sebastian Huber" < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > On 2014-02-28 17:09, Daniel Ramirez wrote: >> >> Work that needs to be done within the scheduler API that would enable SMP. >> >> >> The work on the clustered/partitioned scheduling is on my high

Re: SuperCore Scheduler (GSOC 2014)

On 2014-03-01 01:13, Andre Marques wrote: Hello, As stated in [1] I will be working with RTEMS for my undergraduate thesis, but I'm also looking to work with RTEMS through GSOC. For the last month I have been working on a test case to check rename() POSIX compliance. For GSOC, however, I would

Re: TCP/IP update, possible SMP (GSOC 2014)

On 2014-02-28 17:09, Daniel Ramirez wrote: Work that needs to be done within the scheduler API that would enable SMP. The work on the clustered/partitioned scheduling is on my high priority list, so I hope that the scheduler API will be stable before the GSoC starts. I wil

Re: Condition Variables for RTEMS

On 2014-03-02 03:40, zhang json wrote: 2014-02-28 15:15 GMT+08:00 Sebastian Huber mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>>: On 2014-02-28 01:12, zhang json wrote: 2014-02-26 1:07 GMT+08:00 Gedare Bloom mailto:ged...@rtems.org>

Re: [PATCH 2/4] score: SMP initialization and shutdown changes

On 27/02/2014 8:09 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 2014-02-27 09:16, Chris Johns wrote: On 26/02/2014 7:43 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: First some words to this patch set. It is a gradual improvement of the existing SMP low-level initialization and shutdown procedure. The existing solution was ab