Hello Pavel,
On 2013-07-25 14:14, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Vipul Nayyar,
I have weak appeal to not remove rtems_irq_hdl_param
definition from RTEMS headers. It would cause problems
for code which needs to be compatible with more RTEMS
versions.
we want to remove the legacy interrupt API only f
Hello Vipul Nayyar,
I have weak appeal to not remove rtems_irq_hdl_param
definition from RTEMS headers. It would cause problems
for code which needs to be compatible with more RTEMS
versions.
As for users/functions prototypes, I am not sure, conversion
to (void * ) is OK with me, but on the other
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/csb336/console/uart.c| 16
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/csb336/network/network.c | 4 ++--
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/csb337/network/network.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/csb336/console/uart.c
b/
