On 26/10/2013 1:28 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> I would love to do this across all BSPs but it can also
> break a BSP. The first SPARC executables I got were 0x80
> bytes because I was missing some KEEP() and ENTRY() directives
> in the linker script.
>
> In addition, this isn't a big deal on many
Well, maybe some intrepid volunteer will step up to try it out with
the raspberrypi. :)
-Gedare
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
> On 10/25/2013 9:15 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> Looks ok. Do these options make the most sense with some kind of
>> link-time optimizations enabl
On 10/25/2013 9:15 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Looks ok. Do these options make the most sense with some kind of
> link-time optimizations enabled?
These are the options which tell GCC to put each function
and data element into their own linking section. Then
the linker needs arguments to do the magi
Looks ok. Do these options make the most sense with some kind of
link-time optimizations enabled?
-Gedare
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
> Hi
>
> The attached patch turns on support for function
> and data sections for all SPARC BSPs. In my testing,u
> it has reduced test s
722-9985
>From 24a6943c66d64dd16f79eeeaf88e3af30ed6fb36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joel Sherrill
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:37:17 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] sparc all BSPs: Use function and data sections
This reduces the size of the RTEMS tests on average about 45%.
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/erc32/make/custom/erc32.
