[PATCH 3/5] score: SMP scheduler documentation

2014-05-13 Thread Sebastian Huber
--- .../score/include/rtems/score/schedulersmpimpl.h | 308 1 files changed, 308 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/schedulersmpimpl.h b/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/schedulersmpimpl.h index b00804d..580c641 100644 --- a/cpukit

[PATCH 1/5] score: Scheduler documentation

2014-05-13 Thread Sebastian Huber
--- cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/scheduler.h | 62 +++- cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/schedulerimpl.h | 29 +++--- .../score/include/rtems/score/schedulerpriority.h |2 +- .../rtems/score/schedulerpriorityaffinitysmp.h |2 +- .../include/rtems/sc

Re: [PATCH] doc: Extend documentation for unlimited objects

2014-04-29 Thread Gedare Bloom
No, although the only one I see in confdefs.h is posix msq queues On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > +1 > > One odd thought.. Can we detect when objects which are not unlimited are > configured that way? > > On Apr 29, 2014 10:40 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Looks good to me.

Re: [PATCH] doc: Extend documentation for unlimited objects

2014-04-29 Thread Joel Sherrill
+1 One odd thought.. Can we detect when objects which are not unlimited are configured that way? On Apr 29, 2014 10:40 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: Looks good to me. On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Ralf Kirchner wrote: > Mark POSIX Keys and POSIX Key Value Pairs as supported. > Add list of unsup

Re: [PATCH] doc: Extend documentation for unlimited objects

2014-04-29 Thread Gedare Bloom
Looks good to me. On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Ralf Kirchner wrote: > Mark POSIX Keys and POSIX Key Value Pairs as supported. > Add list of unsupported object classes. > Add hint to unified work areas. > Add example. > --- > doc/user/conf.t | 40 >

[PATCH] doc: Extend documentation for unlimited objects

2014-04-29 Thread Ralf Kirchner
Mark POSIX Keys and POSIX Key Value Pairs as supported. Add list of unsupported object classes. Add hint to unified work areas. Add example. --- doc/user/conf.t | 40 1 Datei geändert, 36 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 4 Zeilen entfernt(-) diff --git a/doc/user/

Re: Documentation

2014-03-13 Thread Chris Johns
On 13/03/2014 10:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello, I tried to find a good place for the user-level profiling documentation and I struggled again with the Doxygen vs. Texinfo duplication. I raised this issue several times over the last years, but we cannot carry on with this parallel

Documentation

2014-03-13 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello, I tried to find a good place for the user-level profiling documentation and I struggled again with the Doxygen vs. Texinfo duplication. I raised this issue several times over the last years, but we cannot carry on with this parallel structure forever. I think it is quite hard to

[PATCH] Add documentation for profiling

2014-03-12 Thread Sebastian Huber
--- doc/bsp_howto/support.t | 11 +++ doc/cpu_supplement/general.t | 12 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/bsp_howto/support.t b/doc/bsp_howto/support.t index 843093a..4441636 100644 --- a/doc/bsp_howto/support.t +++ b/doc/bsp_howto/s

[PATCH 2/8] rtems: Cache manager documentation

2014-02-26 Thread Sebastian Huber
Move useful functions to the top of the file. --- cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/cache.h | 145 -- 1 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/cache.h b/cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/cache.h index 372f8f3..a85

Re: [GSoC] low-level documentation for RTEMS/MMU project

2013-09-28 Thread Gedare Bloom
Update the content on the RTEMS wiki page. Developer blogs are nice, but we also should maintain "living documentation" for the project, and for anyone who might come after to take up. -Gedare On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote: > > > > On Sat, S

Re: [GSoC] low-level documentation for RTEMS/MMU project

2013-09-28 Thread Hesham Moustafa
emature right now. > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Hesham Moustafa > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is low-level documentation that contains design and implementation > > notes for > > libmm/MMU project. Please take a look if you are interested. > > &

Re: [GSoC] low-level documentation for RTEMS/MMU project

2013-09-28 Thread Gedare Bloom
Can you also put this on the MMU wiki page, and eventually we will need to add something to the BSP developer's guide, but that would be premature right now. On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Hesham Moustafa wrote: > Hi, > > This is low-level documentation that contains design and

[GSoC] low-level documentation for RTEMS/MMU project

2013-09-28 Thread Hesham Moustafa
Hi, This is low-level documentation that contains design and implementation notes for libmm/MMU project. Please take a look if you are interested. [1] http://heshamelmatary.blogspot.com/2013/09/inside-low-level-details-of-rtemsmmu.html Thanks, Hesham

Re: [PATCH] configure: Documentation

2013-06-10 Thread Gedare Bloom
This is an improvement. On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > --- > aclocal/enable-multiprocessing.m4|4 +++- > aclocal/enable-smp.m4|3 ++- > c/src/aclocal/enable-multiprocessing.m4 |5 - > c/src/aclocal/enable-smp.m4

[PATCH] configure: Documentation

2013-06-10 Thread Sebastian Huber
--- aclocal/enable-multiprocessing.m4|4 +++- aclocal/enable-smp.m4|3 ++- c/src/aclocal/enable-multiprocessing.m4 |5 - c/src/aclocal/enable-smp.m4 |3 ++- cpukit/aclocal/enable-multiprocessing.m4 |5 - cpukit/aclocal/enable-sm

[GSOC] Submit documentation, etc.

2013-06-03 Thread Gedare Bloom
GSoC Students, TL;DR: submit documentation, join rtems-devel, come to IRC. Make sure to submit your documentation to Google. By now hopefully the relevant information has been posted to the GSoC Students' mailing list. If you have not yet posted your project summary to rtems-devel please