Re: [RollTideFan] Digest for 11/27/2001 01:00:10 AM Eastern Standard Time

2001-12-03 Thread Jeff Todd
Want to bet? Slef -Original Message- From: crimsontidefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:55 PM Subject: Re: [RollTideFan] Digest for 11/27/2001 01:00:10 AM Eastern Standard Time >Better to take the test

Re: [RollTideFan] Digest for 11/27/2001 01:00:10 AM Eastern Standard Time

2001-12-03 Thread Scott Rogers
This is against conventional wisdom of attorneys who represent DUI offenders as a specialty. To the last one, they strongly advise AGAINST taking the test. At least here in North Alabama. I guess it could be different in other jurisdictions. I'll be glad to furnish the phone number of the local gu

Re: [RollTideFan] Digest for 11/27/2001 01:00:10 AM Eastern Standard Time

2001-12-03 Thread crimsontidefan
Failure to take the test is makes you just as guilty if not more. If you take it and fail you could dispute the evidence. Don't take the test and you can't dispute the result? GUILTY! There are issues with calibrations though? Especially if the haven't been performed in the allotted amount of time

RE: [RollTideFan] Digest for 11/27/2001 01:00:10 AM Eastern Standard Time

2001-12-03 Thread Mike Laborde
Now *this* is the kind of info we need before the MCB! Thanks Robby! -Original Message- From: Robby Barton The new Drager Breathalyzer's used by agencies in Alabama calibrate themselves before and after every test. I'm not sure what TN uses but to argue calibration now would not work

Re: [RollTideFan] Digest for 11/27/2001 01:00:10 AM Eastern Standard Time

2001-12-03 Thread Robby Barton
The new Drager Breathalyzer's used by agencies in Alabama calibrate themselves before and after every test. I'm not sure what TN uses but to argue calibration now would not work. The best bet is not to take the test if you are drunk RB - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ;