ietf.org; draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement....@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Request WGLC for draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-24
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
David,
With regards to ECN being implemented for traffic to/from Cloud DCs, do you
have any references? Can you suggest some text f
not acceptable.
From: Black, David
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2023 9:34 AM
To: Linda Dunbar ; rtgwg-chairs
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement@ietf.org;
Black, David
Subject: RE: Request WGLC for draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-24
They are not a
They are not acceptable - see ECN concern in other email.
Thanks, --David
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 4:59 PM
To: Black, David; rtgwg-chairs
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Request WGLC for draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud
, David
Subject: RE: Request WGLC for draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-24
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-24 has addressed all the
> comments and suggestions from RTGDIR, OPSDIR, SECDIR, TSVART, DNSDIR and
> GENART.
That's not correct for the TSVART revi
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-24 has addressed all the
> comments and suggestions from RTGDIR, OPSDIR, SECDIR, TSVART, DNSDIR and
> GENART.
That's not correct for the TSVART review ... but I'm willing to raise the
remaining concerns as WGLC comments if WGLC is started on the -2
