Re: [Rtl]doubts...

2002-10-15 Thread Dennis Rockwell
On 14 Oct, "Himanshu Gupta" wrote: > I have few more basic doubts.well..we load RT tasks as Loadable > kernel module...so it means RT Tasks are running as Kernel level > threads(is this right) if not in what way it they are > different Depends on where in the kernel you mean. The

RE: [Rtl]doubts...

2002-10-14 Thread Dresner, Norman A.
Linux. Norm -Original Message- From: Himanshu Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 8:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Rtl]doubts... Hi ALL, I have few more basic doubts.well..we load RT tasks as Loadable kernel module...so it means RT Tasks are ru

[Rtl]doubts...

2002-10-14 Thread Himanshu Gupta
Hi ALL, I have few more basic doubts.well..we load RT tasks as Loadable kernel module...so it means RT Tasks are running as Kernel level threads(is this right) if not in what way it they are different How is the RTLInux kernel comin into picture and why these Tasks are gettin sch

Re: [rtl] Doubts about the pre-emption capability of RT-Linux

2000-12-10 Thread Nicholas Mc Guire
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > Hi, > > I've few doubts the pre-emption capabilities of RT-Linux. If a periodic > task of Computation time C and period P. Then, in case C>P, then does > the RT-Linux scheduler pre-empt the over-running task pre-empt and > schedule other

[rtl] Doubts about the pre-emption capability of RT-Linux

2000-12-10 Thread Swami
Hi,   I've few doubts the pre-emption capabilities of RT-Linux. If a periodic task of Computation time C and period P. Then, in case C>P, then does the RT-Linux scheduler pre-empt the over-running task pre-empt and schedule other tasks.   I'm asking this because an explicit call is made o p