Re: [RTnet-users] Performance in rtnet

2007-03-28 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dimarts 27 Març 2007 19:49, Jan Kiszka va escriure: [] > > > > Could I have a better numbers or are so good? > > Well, you are also measuring a black box - VxWorks. I don't know how > that OS internally realised its networking stack and what priority it > assigns to ICMP (ping) packets. > > Y

Re: [RTnet-users] Performance in rtnet

2007-03-27 Thread Jan Kiszka
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > A Dilluns 26 Març 2007 18:15, Jan Kiszka va escriure: >> Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> after follow the recomendations of Mr. Kiszka I have configured my system >>> without tdma. >>> >>> Adding the other node in the net with rtroute solicit I ha

Re: [RTnet-users] Performance in rtnet

2007-03-26 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dilluns 26 Març 2007 18:15, Jan Kiszka va escriure: > Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after follow the recomendations of Mr. Kiszka I have configured my system > > without tdma. > > > > Adding the other node in the net with rtroute solicit I have found that > > doing a rtping bet

Re: [RTnet-users] Performance in rtnet

2007-03-26 Thread Jan Kiszka
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > Hi, > > after follow the recomendations of Mr. Kiszka I have configured my system > without tdma. > > Adding the other node in the net with rtroute solicit I have found that doing > a rtping between a rtai+rtnet with a VxWorks box with a cross cable an > unbe

[RTnet-users] Performance in rtnet

2007-03-26 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, after follow the recomendations of Mr. Kiszka I have configured my system without tdma. Adding the other node in the net with rtroute solicit I have found that doing a rtping between a rtai+rtnet with a VxWorks box with a cross cable an unbelieved numbers: # ./rtping -s 1200 192.168.1.4