- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 6:12:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> @Pavel, could you please try to add `%{set_build_flags}` call prior
> calling the `%gem_install`? That sets the `CXX` env variable.
Dne 19. 11. 20 v 16:52 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
This kind of commits does not make me happy :( While the intention is
good, they don't take into consideration any distribution. It is
tailored to the old fashion way of "download tarball & configure & make
& make install", everything runs on single
@Pavel, could you please try to add `%{set_build_flags}` call prior
calling the `%gem_install`? That sets the `CXX` env variable. Does it help?
Vít
So CONFIG["CXX"] is not yet set ( in /usr/lib64/ruby/rbconfig.rb on
x86_64) (see:
Dne 11. 11. 20 v 9:35 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Anyway, thinking about this boostrap project over night and thinking
about this question, I think that my next step should be trying to use
the miniruby after `make clean`, which should bring the tarball
content closer to upstream repository.
> This kind of commits does not make me happy :( While the intention is
> good, they don't take into consideration any distribution. It is
> tailored to the old fashion way of "download tarball & configure & make
> & make install", everything runs on single machine :/
>
> Does anybody have a tip
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:42 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Not sure if anybody noticed the "Review changes" link of the
> Rubygem.org, but this is the example:
>
> https://my.diffend.io/gems/gem2rpm/1.0.0/1.0.1
>
> It seems quite handy to what we do.
I did not know the "Review changes" link in the
Not sure if anybody noticed the "Review changes" link of the
Rubygem.org, but this is the example:
https://my.diffend.io/gems/gem2rpm/1.0.0/1.0.1
It seems quite handy to what we do.
Vít
OpenPGP_0x0CE09EE79917B87C.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description:
