Re: Future of -doc subpackages

2024-09-02 Thread jprokop
On 9/2/24 4:18 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Today, I had a discussion with Mikolaj Izdebsky, maintainer of various Java pacakges including Ant / Maven. At the beginning, he mentioned possible license issues he is dealing with in -javadoc subpackages, then he mentioned bundled jQuery, etc. All these

Re: Ruby 3.3

2024-01-03 Thread jprokop
On 1/3/24 11:23, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 02. 01. 24 v 21:50 Pavel Valena napsal(a): My build succeeded everywhere. Nevertheless, there were some reports about issues with fibers (e.g. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20085). So we should probably observe and

Re: Ruby 3.3

2024-01-02 Thread jprokop
On 1/2/24 16:41, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 02. 01. 24 v 16:15 Pavel Valena napsal(a): On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi everybody and happy new year, Being back from holidays, here is Ruby 3.3.0. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86668

Re: Ruby 3.3

2024-01-02 Thread jprokop
On 9/12/23 10:08, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi, It is again the time to look at where Ruby 3.3 development stands. So here is PR with the changes: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/159 Trying out Ruby 3.3.0 official release in local mock, I hit SSL issues with tests in net-http

Re: Ruby 3.3

2023-11-09 Thread jprokop
On 11/9/23 18:27, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 07. 11. 23 v 12:56 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a): Hi, On 11/1/23 17:13, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi, Here is yet another Ruby 3.3 snapshot, this time a1e24ab484: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108418495 The respective changes are avai

Re: Ruby 3.3

2023-11-07 Thread jprokop
Hi, On 11/1/23 17:13, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi, Here is yet another Ruby 3.3 snapshot, this time a1e24ab484: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108418495 The respective changes are available in my PR. There is nothing particular what would catch my attention. Happy testing and

Re: Ruby 3.3 change proposal

2023-11-02 Thread jprokop
On 11/1/23 11:17, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi Rubyists, The release of Ruby 3.3 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.3 change proposal [1]. It is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since I don't expect any controversy (it is mostly copy p

Re: Ruby 3.3

2023-11-01 Thread jprokop
On 11/1/23 15:01, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 01. 11. 23 v 11:27 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a): Hi On 10/12/23 17:20, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi, I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The changes are in the PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/159

Re: Ruby 3.3

2023-11-01 Thread jprokop
Hi On 10/12/23 17:20, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi, I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The changes are in the PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/159 And the scratch build is running here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107

Re: Packaging Ruby gem documentation

2022-10-25 Thread jprokop
On 10/25/22 14:46, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 25. 10. 22 v 13:12 Jarek Prokop napsal(a): The other subthread with Jarek reminded me that one of the options could be to extract/fork the whole Darkfish generator instead of monkey patching. But Darkfish is pretty complex. We would probably not

Re: Packaging Ruby gem documentation

2022-10-25 Thread jprokop
On 10/24/22 17:42, Vít Ondruch wrote: So here is my proof of concept: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/vondruch/public_git/darkfish.git/ https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=93399794 It can be executed as follows: <...snip...> And now a few remarks and questions: 1) I hoped