t;
>> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 4:57:24 PM
>> Subject: Re: FTBFS's: cannot load such file - racc/*
>>
>> Just to keep you updated, so far I have tried to remove the bigdecimal
>> subpackage (yes, I know, this is about racc,
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 4:57:24 PM
> Subject: Re: FTBFS's: cannot load such file - racc/*
>
> Just to keep you updated, so far I have tried to remove the bigdecimal
&
Just to keep you updated, so far I have tried to remove the bigdecimal
subpackage (yes, I know, this is about racc, but since we should treat
everything the same, I started with bigdecimal although the result would
be the same for racc) and my initial thought was "keep everything the
same, just mov
I encourage everybody to read the following discussion:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-racc/pull-request/1
It might result in significant changes to a way we (un)bundle gems from
Ruby. I am really considering to keep the StdLib bundled in Ruby.
Vít
Dne 05. 02. 20 v 14:17 Pavel Val
Hello,
as you probably know with Ruby 2.7, there came some incompatible changes. One
of them is that `racc` was gemified and is not installed by default into a
buildroot.
From my brief investigations of build failures (the list may not be complete or
a bit outdated), I've encountered these:
