On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:15 PM, ajay paswan wrote:
> Robert Klemme wrote in post #1086457:
>
>> Why do you want to do that? That will cripple throughput more than
>> necessary.
> To solve: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/4408352#new
I don't see how your solution is necessary to solve that.
Ch
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:03 PM, ajay paswan wrote:
> now I want to make step 2 and step 3 an atomic statement, it means when
> one thread goes to statement 2, every other thread should stop and run
> only when that particular thread completes step 3. Is it possible? How?
>
> note mutex is not th
