Re: [Rubygems-developers] Questions about Gem Platform Matching

2007-09-28 Thread Luis Lavena
On 9/28/07, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm working on a patch and checking the tests cases. > Pointless... it seems that on different platforms (darwin as example) compile something in darwin will be compatible with darwin8, but not darwin7 or 9 (as test_gem_platform.rb assert). h

Re: [Rubygems-developers] Questions about Gem Platform Matching

2007-09-28 Thread Luis Lavena
On 9/28/07, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 27, 2007, at 18:39 , Luis Lavena wrote: > > > > Should the version for mswin32 (current nil) be used for this case? > > Probably. Is there a way to get the value out of Config::CONFIG? > # Ruby built with VC6 (official) 1.8.6-p110 irb(mai

Re: [Rubygems-developers] New setup.rb

2007-09-28 Thread Eric Hodel
On Sep 28, 2007, at 10:04 , Berger, Daniel wrote: >> I replaced the giant setup.rb with a small one we can easily debug. >> It seems to fix all the issues people have been having. >> >> Please test it out on windows, I do not have one of those set up for >> development. >> >> It also comes with --n

Re: [Rubygems-developers] New setup.rb

2007-09-28 Thread Luis Lavena
On 9/28/07, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I replaced the giant setup.rb with a small one we can easily debug. > It seems to fix all the issues people have been having. > > Please test it out on windows, I do not have one of those set up for > development. > > It also comes with --no-rdoc

Re: [Rubygems-developers] Questions about Gem Platform Matching

2007-09-28 Thread Luis Lavena
On 9/28/07, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think people expect an x86-mswin32 platform gem to work with > whatever the latest one-click installer is. RubyGems also provides a > required_ruby_version check, so you can lock it down to a particular > ruby one-click version. Forgot to me

Re: [Rubygems-developers] Questions about Gem Platform Matching

2007-09-28 Thread Luis Lavena
On 9/28/07, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Probably. Is there a way to get the value out of Config::CONFIG? > > I think people expect an x86-mswin32 platform gem to work with > whatever the latest one-click installer is. RubyGems also provides a > required_ruby_version check, so you ca

Re: [Rubygems-developers] New setup.rb

2007-09-28 Thread Berger, Daniel
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Eric Hodel > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 10:27 AM > To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org > Subject: [Rubygems-developers] New setup.rb > > > I replaced the giant setup.rb with a small one we

[Rubygems-developers] New setup.rb

2007-09-28 Thread Eric Hodel
I replaced the giant setup.rb with a small one we can easily debug. It seems to fix all the issues people have been having. Please test it out on windows, I do not have one of those set up for development. It also comes with --no-rdoc and --no-ri, and the gem updater has been hooked into t

Re: [Rubygems-developers] Questions about Gem Platform Matching

2007-09-28 Thread Eric Hodel
On Sep 27, 2007, at 18:39 , Luis Lavena wrote: > Hello guys, > > After reading Eric's post about the new Gem Platform Matching in > trunk... I have done some testing now that my sandbox is full of > rubies: > > $ ruby -v ~/Desktop/platform.rb > ruby 1.8.6 (2007-09-23 patchlevel 110) [i386-mingw32]