> -Original Message-
> From: rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org
> [mailto:rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf
> Of Eric Hodel
> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 9:23 PM
> To: RubyGems developers mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Revision 2154 Result
> -Original Message-
> From: rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org
> [mailto:rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf
> Of Luis Lavena
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 3:02 PM
> To: RubyGems Developers (ML)
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] Revision 2142, checking for nmak
> -Original Message-
> From: rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org
> [mailto:rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf
> Of Eric Hodel
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:50 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] gem problem
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org
> [mailto:rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf
> Of Eric Hodel
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 11:52 AM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] gem problem
>
> O
Hi,
How does everyone feel about a #rubygems irc channel where we could congregate
to discuss rubygems development issues? Good idea or not worth the effort?
Regards,
Dan
___
Rubygems-developers mailing list
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://ru
> -Original Message-
> From: rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org
> [mailto:rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf
> Of Luis Lavena
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 7:21 AM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] 1.3.2?
>
> On Thu,
> -Original Message-
> From: rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org
> [mailto:rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf
> Of Daniel Berger
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 5:41 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Question on p
> -Original Message-
> From: rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org
> [mailto:rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf
> Of Luis Lavena
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:21 AM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Gem location and si
elopers] Gem location and site arch
> directory
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Luis Lavena
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Berger, Daniel
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> What do people think about RF Bug #14943.
> >>
velopers] Question on platform, x64
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Berger, Daniel
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I released sys-proctable 0.8.0 last night. The Linux
> version has its own source file (pure Ruby), and the
> resulting gem is called "sy
Hi,
I released sys-proctable 0.8.0 last night. The Linux version has its own source
file (pure Ruby), and the resulting gem is called
"sys-proctable-0.8.0-x86-linux.gem". However, when I try to install it on a
RHEL here at work, it tries to install an older version.
I _think_ this is happening
Hi,
What do people think about RF Bug #14943.
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=14943&group_id=126&atid=575
If I read it correctly, C extensions should be installed as
"lib/i386-msvcr80/foo.so" instead of "lib/foo.so" (on Windows/VC8, for example).
It seems reasonable to m
> -Original Message-
> From: rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org
> [mailto:rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf
> Of Berger, Daniel
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:18 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-develo
Hi,
I'm curious as to why Gem#gem doesn't autorequire the library:
require 'rubygems'
gem 'ptools'
require 'ptools' # Must I do this?
p File.which('ruby')
If I leave out the 'require' on line 3 it doesn't work.
I checked rubygems.rb and the $LOAD_PATH definitely includes the path
where the gems
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org
> [mailto:rubygems-developers-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf
> Of Eric Hodel
> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 4:00 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Add a
> Gem::S
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Charlie Savage
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 9:29 AM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Executing code after installing gem
>
> > RubyGems is not desig
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Berger, Daniel
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 3:25 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] Question on class cache updates
>
&
Hi
>From the journal of Phil Hagelberg:
http://technomancy.us/117
"It'd be better if Rubygems allowed 2.2.0.a to be treated specially as a
prerelease version that would be superceded by a later real release, and
that's what Josh Susser, Alex Vollmer, and myself worked on."
I'd rather not get in
Hi,
I have a quick question on class cache updates. It seems to be updating
the class cache even if I don't specify -u on the command line. Is that
expected behavior?
RubyGems Environment:
- RUBYGEMS VERSION: 1.3.1
- RUBY VERSION: 1.8.6 (2008-03-03 patchlevel 114) [i386-mswin32_80]
- INSTAL
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Berger, Daniel
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 3:15 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Readline relationship?
>
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> Look awkward, since I didn't had readline early while
> bootstrapping the new one-click and it worked fine. I just
> did a grep through the sources and couldn't find a reference
> to require 'readline' directly, neither usage of Readline.
>
> Maybe something went south on that gem?
Oh
Hi,
> >>
> >> Gem::location_of_caller is insufficient for windows paths :/
> >
> > How does this look?
> >
> > C:\>diff -u rubygems.orig rubygems.rb
> > --- rubygems.orig Mon Sep 29 08:01:06 2008
> > +++ rubygems.rb Tue Oct 21 14:29:27 2008
> > @@ -479,8 +479,9 @@
> > # The file name an
Hi,
I'm currently running a version of Ruby without readline support (yep,
Windows). When I run a "gem install" I get this:
C:\>gem install win32-ipc
Successfully installed win32-ipc-0.5.1
1 gem installed
Installing ri documentation for win32-ipc-0.5.1...
C:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/c
Hi,
> >> Silencing the PATH warning for unpack Fixes for
> Gem.inflate, deflate,
> >> etc.
> >> Switched to MiniTest for 1.9 compatibility Gem.dir reads
> >
> > Are you making minitest a requirement even for 1.8.x? That's how it
> > seems to be now:
>
> Yes.
How will that work in practice
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Eric Hodel
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 7:38 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] Please test for a 1.3.1
>
> I will be including the current trunk on Thu
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Jim Freeze
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:15 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] Gem Names not correlated to
> require name
>
> Hi
>
> Some of the lo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Eric Hodel
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:46 AM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] The return of PLATFORM constants
>
> On May 11, 2008, at 10:18 AM, D
Hi,
I can't seem to get rid of an old pre-rubygems 1.0 sys-uname gem:
gem env
RubyGems Environment:
- RUBYGEMS VERSION: 1.1.1
- RUBY VERSION: 1.8.6 (2007-09-24 patchlevel 111) [i386-mswin32]
- INSTALLATION DIRECTORY: c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8
- RUBY EXECUTABLE: c:/ruby/bin/ruby.exe
- R
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Luis Lavena
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:12 PM
> To: RubyGems Developers (ML)
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] trunk segfault on Windows
>
> Hello fellow ruby developers!,
>
> Been away a f
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Berger, Daniel
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:54 AM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] warnings from open-uri
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Chad Woolley
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 11:05 AM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] warnings from open-uri
>
> Can I get some feedback on this:
>
> http
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trans
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 6:45 AM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] WARNINGS
>
>
>
> On Feb 1, 5:22 am, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
s.orgdown ?)
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 01:57:04PM -0600, Berger, Daniel wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > > Jeremy Hinegardner
> > > Sent: Monday, January
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Jeremy Hinegardner
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:09 AM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] rubygems.org down ?
>
> I'm getting a 503 Service Temporarily Un
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trans
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 11:31 AM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] gemspec extensions attribute
>
> On Nov 6, 2007 12:42 PM, Luis Lavena <
> On Oct 23, 2007, at 12:46 , Jim Weirich wrote:
> > On Oct 23, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:
> >> Sorry if I've missed this.
> >>
> >> Is the latest rubygems not going to ask me if I want to install
> >> prerequisites? Because with the
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Luis Lavena
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 2:21 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] RubyGems don't like binaries
> for executables
>
>
> This behaviour i
Sorry if I've missed this.
Is the latest rubygems not going to ask me if I want to install
prerequisites? Because with the current svn version it just installs
them without asking. On Windows, anyway.
Regards,
Dan
This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
priv
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trans
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:12 AM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] Finding where gems are stored
>
>
> So when did /var/lib become the place to st
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Luis Lavena
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:13 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] RubyGems on Win32: .bat
> and.cmd dilemma.
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm t
7;"
>
>
> On Oct 5, 2007, at 07:19 , Berger, Daniel wrote:
> > Just saw this, thought it might be of interest:
> >
> > http://blog.ra66i.org/archives/informatics/2007/10/05/calling-on-
> > the-gc-
> > after-rubygems/
> >
> > Basically, the OP
Hi all,
Just saw this, thought it might be of interest:
http://blog.ra66i.org/archives/informatics/2007/10/05/calling-on-the-gc-
after-rubygems/
Basically, the OP says that calling GC.start after require'ing rubygems
saved a good amount of memory.
Regards,
Dan
This communication is the prope
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Eric Hodel
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 10:27 AM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] New setup.rb
>
>
> I replaced the giant setup.rb with a small one we
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Daniel Berger
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:37 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] Test failures for 0.9.4.4 beta
> on Windows
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Rub
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Eric Hodel
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 1:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Recognizing Platforms
>
>
> On Aug 19, 2007, at 16
atiblewith Ruby 1.9 HEAD
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 02:10:39PM -0500, Berger, Daniel wrote:
> > What difference does that make? The arrow notation is optional.
>
> Using Ruby 1.9 HEAD as of today:
Ooof. Please say it isn't so.
Dan
This communication is the property o
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Jos Backus
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 12:58 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] [patch] lib/rubygems/format.rb
> not compatiblewith Ruby 1.9 HEAD
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Michael Behan
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 12:42 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] Time.at in Windows
>
>
> Hello!
>
> If this has been brought up on the
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Nick Sieger
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 3:22 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Gem not found w/ no source
> cache file
>
>
> On 6/1/07, Nick Sieger
Saw this at the end of a "gem update --system" on OS X 10.4.9 with Ruby
1.8.6:
hook
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rubygems-update-0.9.4/./post-install.r
b
failed:
undefined method `file_name' for # Try
'ruby setup.rb --help' for detailed usage. RubyGems system software
updated daniel-bergers
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Wes Gamble
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 3:36 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Gem repository and/or
> localgeminstallation issues
>
>
> Ruby 1.8.4.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Wes Gamble
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:53 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Rubygems-developers] Gem repository and/or
> local geminstallation issues
>
>
> I had to r
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Cerberus
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 12:41 PM
> To: rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
> Subject: [Rubygems-developers] [rubygems] Build broken by
> drbrain (#1201)
> 1) Failure:
> test_cl
53 matches
Mail list logo
