On 7/7/07, Evan Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I tend to agree with this. I don't really understand the need to
> "canonically" identify a resource based on its context.
>
> Other thoughts?
>
> Evan
>
>
> > On 7/7/07, Josh Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a real grudge ag
I tend to agree with this. I don't really understand the need to
"canonically" identify a resource based on its context.
Other thoughts?
Evan
> On 7/7/07, Josh Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I have a real grudge against the new nested polymorphic path magic
> > stuff. I feel it encour
I have a real grudge against the new nested polymorphic path magic
stuff. I feel it encourages and gives people an excuse to write overly
compelled routes. Resources should NOT be nested more than one level
deep.
"/companies/1/people/1" == BAD
"/people/1" == GOOD
I have no problem with nested co
Gabe da Silveira wrote:
> Ugg, this is from my patch. I know nothing about Oracle. Can someone
> explain what the error means and why the query is in a subselect?
Haven't had a chance to look at yet, but for pagination (ie., limit or
offset) you need to use a subquery for Oracle.
--~--~-
Ugg, this is from my patch. I know nothing about Oracle. Can someone
explain what the error means and why the query is in a subselect?
On 7/6/07, Michael Schoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "nzkoz" has kicked AR/Oracle while it was down...
>
> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/7167
> -
"nzkoz" has kicked AR/Oracle while it was down...
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/7167
r7167 | nzkoz | 2007-07-06 19:42:42 -0700 (Fri, 06 Jul 2007) | 3 lines
Move from select * to select tablename.* to avoid clobbering
Great, thanks. If anything goes wrong I'll definitely be around to
add additional test cases and further tweaks if necessary.
On 7/6/07, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8889
> >
> > The solution is 1.5 lines, and I have a test included. Teste
> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8889
>
> The solution is 1.5 lines, and I have a test included. Tested under
> mysql... not sure if the syntax can be assumed the way I did it for
> all cases...
>
I've applied the fix because I've also been bitten by this. But we'll
have to keep an eye out f
> I just don't think that the content type should mandate the template
> format. It should prefer a specific format, but if that format
> doesn't exist, I think it should use the Accepts header to determine
> other template formats.
There be dragons. The accepts header is a constant source of
s
On Jul 7, 2007, at 5:04 AM, Josh Peek wrote:
> Referring to brandon's example... (http://pastie.caboo.se/76204)
>
> It seems to me like it should act that way. If I wanted to change the
> template format, I would do render :action =>
> "index.html.erb", :layout => false (Not tested, but I hope w
> I can't see any trace of it in edge either (or even a comment
> explaining a similar fix).
> A cursory inspection with tcpdump and a current version of Safari
> suggests it is no longer a problem (According to the changelog the
> original fix dates back to 2005) and so perhaps this was just remo
On 7/7/07, Josh Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Referring to brandon's example... (http://pastie.caboo.se/76204)
>
> It seems to me like it should act that way. If I wanted to change the
> template format, I would do render :action =>
> "index.html.erb", :layout => false (Not tested, but I hop
Referring to brandon's example... (http://pastie.caboo.se/76204)
It seems to me like it should act that way. If I wanted to change the
template format, I would do render :action =>
"index.html.erb", :layout => false (Not tested, but I hope works)
I just don't really see it as a bug, although, I'
On 7/6/07, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It appears that #8174 on edge broke the ability to render HTML in the
> > JS respond_to block for an ajax request. Line 131 of
> > mime_responds.rb explicitly sets the template_format to that of the
> > mime type. This forces action v
> It appears that #8174 on edge broke the ability to render HTML in the
> JS respond_to block for an ajax request. Line 131 of
> mime_responds.rb explicitly sets the template_format to that of the
> mime type. This forces action view to only look for templates of
> that format (including layouts
I've just put a new and improved form of the patch we've been discussing
on the list into http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8714. I'd appreciate it
if someone in core could review and, if there aren't any problems with it,
apply it.
Thanks,
- Matt
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 02:58:20PM -, mikong wrote:
>
> > The best I can find through a quick trawl is
> > actionpack/test/controller/controller_fixtures/app/models
>
> How about creating a file in the same directory where render_test.rb
> is located (i.e. actionpack/test/controller)? There'
> Well, I was asked to include #5484 into this ticket, so it is dealing
> with distinct bugs at once.
Sounds good. This patch breaks sqlite's tests, if you can merge
those in, it seems good to apply.
> To understand those bugs, let's begin with a single migration that
> creates a table with
> The patch is here: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8891
I've forgotten why the return false was required for around filters.
Couldn't we do:
yielded = false
filter.call(self) do
yielded = true
# all remaining before and around filters will be run in this call
index = call_filters(chain
Have you ever wanted to test your API output without those pesky
assert_select error messages? Well now you can!
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8173
The patch has been sitting there quietly with no comment for a couple
months now. I think it should be pretty easy to apply. It won't
affect
On 7/6/07, inkling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I love the query cache from rails edge, but I didn't want to put our
> production app on edge just yet. (went down that route in the 1.1.x
> days, and the edge cut me a few times). So I think I have it ported
> into a plugin we can use on 1.2.x
>
I love the query cache from rails edge, but I didn't want to put our
production app on edge just yet. (went down that route in the 1.1.x
days, and the edge cut me a few times). So I think I have it ported
into a plugin we can use on 1.2.x
http://query-cache.googlecode.com/svn/query_cache/
Basi
The Truth About Creative Baby Shower Thank You Poems
Where are the cutest baby shower thank you poems?
Don't you know the best thank you poems lie somewhere deep in your
imagination?
http://2site.com/kzfcnq
The secret of picking the right domain name
This little article tells you how to pic
Here we go http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8900
Cheers,
Pratik
On Jul 5, 12:59 am, "Michael Koziarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Notice some of those tickets were closed a month ago? I don't think
> > they want it to be fixed... But if you can do it, sure, I'll check
> > out the fixes a
I ran into this same situation and just went with the Rails flow.
Aesthetically the class name is not ideal, but the underscore
crs_contact is certainly nicer than c_r_s_contact. Given that
hundreds of apps probably rely on this behaviour it seems like a bad
idea to change it.
On 7/6/07, Rich C
The standard approach to acronyms in class names is to capitalize only
the first letter, e.g., CrsContact. The underscore/camelize process is
then perfectly reversible.
- Jamis
On 7/6/07, Rich C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello All,
> I've submitted a patch (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/tick
Hello All,
I've submitted a patch (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8898) to
enable #underscore to be reversible.
I had trouble creating a class named "CRSContact", and it turns out
that underscore and camelize are not reversible in cases where there
are 3 or more capital letters. As there i
On Jul 3, 4:45 pm, "Jonathan Viney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote a small plugin a while ago that alters how the setup and teardown
> methods work. With minor changes it should let you do what you want.
>
> http://svn.viney.net.nz/things/rails/plugins/testcase_setup_and_teard...
>
> -Jona
> but I'm obviously misunderstanding what's going on in method_added, since
> this method doesn't appear to be getting run.
A bit of extra logging cleared this one up for me. Here is a bit of a
hack to get this working:
def self.method_added(method)
case method.to_s
when 's
> but I'm obviously misunderstanding what's going on in method_added, since
> this method doesn't appear to be getting run.
A bit of extra logging cleared this one up for me. Here is a bit of a
hack to get this working:
def self.method_added(method)
case method.to_s
when 's
> The best I can find through a quick trawl is
> actionpack/test/controller/controller_fixtures/app/models
How about creating a file in the same directory where render_test.rb
is located (i.e. actionpack/test/controller)? There's a file there
fake_controllers.rb that's used by 4 test files:
asser
On 6 Jul 2007, at 12:29, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 11:29:40AM +0100, Frederick Cheung wrote:
>> occasionally the last byte of the post body was going missing. I
>> tracked it down to the following method in action_controller/cgi_ext/
>> raw_post_data_fix:
>>
>> def read_b
if that doesn't fix your problem, I also found a different bug in the edge
filter processing that occurs when one filter adds an additional filter
while processing - a bug in update_filter_chain.
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8383
-Andrew
On 7/6/07, Stefan Kaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 11:29:40AM +0100, Frederick Cheung wrote:
> occasionally the last byte of the post body was going missing. I
> tracked it down to the following method in action_controller/cgi_ext/
> raw_post_data_fix:
>
> def read_body(content_length)
> stdinput.binmode if stdinput
Hi,
I've been working on a problem we've been having with our app. In
essence we have a controller that receives a blob of binary data (as
a raw post) and processes it (this data happens to be a marshaled
ruby object but that's not relevant here). The problem was that
occasionally the las
A patch is here: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8891
On 6/27/07, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Filter chaining appears to behave in differently than Rails 1.2.x. It
> > seems that I'm getting a lot of errors along the lines of:
> >
> > ActionController::ActionController
The patch is here: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8891
-- stefan
On Jul 4, 4:25 am, "Michael Koziarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan has a patch for these problems and more. Hopefully it'll show
> up on trac in the next few days.
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Koz
--~--~-~--~~-
37 matches
Mail list logo
