Hey gang.
Can I get some love on ticket 10681 (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/
10681)? I've refactored ActionController::Verification and cleaned up
the docs. As described in the ticket, all tests pass, and I've
verified against my own applications.
I'd really appreciate some additional ver
Obie Fernandez (http://www.jroller.com/obie/entry/render_text_gotcha)
was asking in the #rails-contrib channel about getting this ticket
(http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6684) fixed. If someone's free
could you please review/verify it and appease the "ignored" ticket
reporter ;)?
Cheers,
Chu Ye
Jeremy McAnally wrote:
> Yeah we moved all the book work over to the Basecamp. I think we're
> keeping the core work there and then we'll handle tickets, issues, and
> other input through Lighthouse.
>
> We'll hopefully have some more information soon (we're hacking out an
> outline and such at
Yeah we moved all the book work over to the Basecamp. I think we're
keeping the core work there and then we'll handle tickets, issues, and
other input through Lighthouse.
We'll hopefully have some more information soon (we're hacking out an
outline and such at present).
--Jeremy
On Jan 2, 2008
Anthony Kelly wrote:
> This looks pretty good. I saw the other thing on lighthouse:
> http://railsdocs.lighthouseapp.com/projects/2637
Oops I meant:
http://www.railsdocumentation.org/book.html
It wasn't on lighthouse, that one never took off.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---
Michael Slater wrote:
> My colleague Christopher Haupt and I are deep into building a portal
> site to serve Ruby on Rails developers at www.BuildingWebApps.com.
> We're going to be providing annotated links to all the key content on
> the web related to Rails, and we'll have quite a few of our o
August Lilleaas wrote:
> Because of the reasons mentioned above. An API is a reference tool,
> and has a tremendously steep learning curve if you don't know anything
> about Rails. The API is indeed documentation, but it's not sufficient
> for a beginner. So, the official documentation is no good
This is an old issue from before it was a gem. The two tickets that
describe the bugs are #8400 and #10629. What will happen now that it is
a gem?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
Need an active record expert to look into two tickets on the Sybase
adapter (which is now a gem). Tickets are #8400 and #10629. Thanks in
advance!
~ Anthony
Jeremy Burks wrote:
> The same issue occurs with validates_uniqueness_of:
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk/browse_thread
The build has been fixed.
CHANGES
---
Revision 8526 committed by bitsweat on 2008-01-02 18:09:52
Fix failing date helper test. Closes #10664 [Wesley Moxam]
M /trunk/actionpack/test/template/date_helper_test.rb
See http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com/builds/RubyOnRails/8526 for detai
I'm hoping someone from core would be willing to commit this one:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10565
And also to just get a thumbs-up or down on this one, one way or the
other. We've had several opinions and I think it's in need of an
"official Rails opinion" at this point:
http://dev.rub
Fix for the bad (failing) test here: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10664
On Jan 2, 5:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The build failed.
>
> CHANGES
> ---
> Revision 8522 committed by bitsweat on 2008-01-02 09:03:56
> db:sessions:clear task uses session_table_name method. Closes #10631 [C
On 2 Jan 2008, at 13:31, Pratik wrote:
>
> Sweet. Now you can wait for a core member to apply the patch. If you
> lose patience, you can always try to find a core guy in #rails-contrib
> irc channel at irc.freenode.net
And bear in mind that the last 10 days or so have been quiet, what
with ch
> > Can anybody advise or just review the patch and take care of the issue?
What you just did (posting about your ticket here) works too ;) Your
ticket is already verified so all that's left is to raise it to the
attention of a Rails core committer so he can review and probably
apply it. And this
Sweet. Now you can wait for a core member to apply the patch. If you
lose patience, you can always try to find a core guy in #rails-contrib
irc channel at irc.freenode.net
On Jan 2, 2008 1:25 PM, Yuri Leikind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Rails people,
>
> I submitted a patch recently to ge
Hello Rails people,
I submitted a patch recently to get rid of an annoying exception raised when
an AR
object is created - http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10556 , had some
people review it,
got some pluses... What am I supposed to do now?
Can anybody advise or just review the patch and take car
The build failed.
CHANGES
---
Revision 8522 committed by bitsweat on 2008-01-02 09:03:56
db:sessions:clear task uses session_table_name method. Closes #10631 [Cheah Chu
Yeow]
M /trunk/railties/lib/tasks/databases.rake
Revision 8523 committed by bitsweat on 2008-01-02 09:08:14
Ruby 1.9 co
The build failed.
CHANGES
---
Revision 8521 committed by bitsweat on 2008-01-02 09:01:19
Correct Hash#assert_valid_keys docs. Closes #10621 [Cheah Chu Yeow, blackanger]
M /trunk/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/hash/keys.rb
TEST FAILURES AND ERRORS
---
Name:
The build failed.
CHANGES
---
Revision 8519 committed by bitsweat on 2008-01-02 08:28:58
SQLite: db:drop:all doesn't fail silently if the database is already open.
Closes #10577.
M /trunk/railties/lib/tasks/databases.rake
M /trunk/railties/CHANGELOG
TEST FAILURES AND ERRORS
-
The build failed.
CHANGES
---
Revision 8518 committed by bitsweat on 2008-01-02 08:26:37
Fix invalid time test. Closes #10632 [Dirkjan Bussink]
M /trunk/activesupport/test/core_ext/time_ext_test.rb
M /trunk/activesupport/CHANGELOG
M /trunk/activesupport/test/multibyte_chars_test.rb
20 matches
Mail list logo
