> > Any chance of http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10980 making it to
> > stable? I'd say it's a pretty crucial fix. It was fixed in the following
> > changeset: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/8787.
>
> Isn't this a feature change?
Yeah, it's not going to be backported. Load order changes
This ticket provides a patch to allow using uploaded files in Integration tests.
It's been verified and several people seem to want it. (It fixes a
problem first ticketed 2 years ago).
There was a problem with the testcase which was part of the original
patch, because of the way the TESTCASE was
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:29 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The build has been fixed.
This change of CI build status is a result of fixing the build
environment according to
http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com/builds/RubyOnRails/8906.
rake test_postgres now accesses the test database wi
The build has been fixed.
CHANGES
---
Build was manually requested
See http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com/builds/RubyOnRails/8927.1 for
details.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on R
Despite documentation implying otherwise, only two out of the three
collection associations support the 'replace' (and by extension, '=')
method. The third, HasManyThroughAssociation, does not.
Fortunately, it is pretty easy to add the support. I've done that
with my patch (failing tests includ
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Gerjan Stokkink <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any chance of http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10980 making it to
> stable? I'd say it's a pretty crucial fix. It was fixed in the following
> changeset: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/8787.
Isn't this a fea
Any chance of http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10980 making it to
stable? I'd say it's a pretty crucial fix. It was fixed in the following
changeset: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/8787.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
On 25 Feb 2008, at 08:12, dasil003 wrote:
>
> I'm going through my old tickets, and I found an outstanding ticket
> that I've put many hours into, and is absolutely critical for a
> production project that I'm now updating to Rails 2.0.2. The ticket:
>
Is still still relevant with http://dev.ru
I'm going through my old tickets, and I found an outstanding ticket
that I've put many hours into, and is absolutely critical for a
production project that I'm now updating to Rails 2.0.2. The ticket:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/9560
This comes on the tail of:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/
