> You say it like "we just need volunteers." I've worked feverishly to
> little result to wrangle people into writing Rails documentation.
>
> If you know of a mythical large group of people who want to write
> docs, then please whip them into a documentation fury and unleash them
> upon Rails.
>
On Jul 18, 1:47 pm, Josh Susser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, exactly. I talked with David Dollar on IRC about this. I've
> done this in a way that is similar to your recipe in ARR, but I create/
> update the associated models in a before_validation callback, rather
> than in the sette
I made a GitHub project to catalog the various approaches to the multi-
model form problem.
http://github.com/ryanb/complex-form-examples/
You can find my approach using David Dollar's fork here:
http://github.com/ryanb/complex-form-examples/tree/ddollar-accessible
It greatly simplifies the code
On Jul 18, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Ryan Bates wrote:
>
> Good point David, this can be very dangerous if always enabled due to
> form injection. But when intentionally enabled, this has the potential
> to greatly simplify multi-model forms - which I love!
>
> Out of curiosity, have you tried making a
> Good point David, this can be very dangerous if always enabled due to
> form injection. But when intentionally enabled, this has the potential
> to greatly simplify multi-model forms - which I love!
>
> Out of curiosity, have you tried making a multi-model form with this?
> I can if you want. Th
Good point David, this can be very dangerous if always enabled due to
form injection. But when intentionally enabled, this has the potential
to greatly simplify multi-model forms - which I love!
Out of curiosity, have you tried making a multi-model form with this?
I can if you want. There are a l
I don't believe that change was deliberate, and it probably shouldn't
have been. If you send a patch to flip the order around, we can fix
that right up.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Alex MacCaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm just wondering about the switch from mongrel to thin as the
> d
I'm just wondering about the switch from mongrel to thin as the
default server.
I'm not sure it's such a good one, considering that the --debugger
option doesn't work for example.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
D.Gray-Man 167
D.Gray-Man 167, Air Gear 210, Naruto 409，Bleach 318（Bleach 330), One
Piece 507，Hot manga Download
The hottest mangas and the latest chapters
Manga news, Most popular mangas, Latest mangas, Latest chapters
http://english1.isoshu.com
http://emanga1.isoshu.com
--~--~-~--~
