Hey guys,
So the last time we did an RC we chose the version number of 2.0.99,
and this caused some problems for people and led to a pretty heated
test. So, the draft plan this time is:
* 2.2.0 for RC1
* 2.2.0.N for RCN
* 2.2.1 for Final 2.2 release
However, this is 'kinda weird' so before we
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Michael Koziarski [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
* 2.2.0 for RC1
* 2.2.0.N for RCN
* 2.2.1 for Final 2.2 release
+1
It might be more consistent to make RC1 be 2.2.0.1, but this is fine.
The basic idea is that 2.1 is not 2.2. If people want to stay on 2.1, or do
a
