On Saturday 18 April 2009, pedz wrote:
> On Apr 17, 5:10 pm, Michael Schuerig wrote:
> > My general idea is to support only MySQL and PostgreSQL in the
> > first iteration in case the other DBMS require special. Also, as
> > there may be reservations about this feature, I think there ought
> > to
On Apr 17, 5:10 pm, Michael Schuerig wrote:
> My general idea is to support only MySQL and PostgreSQL in the first
> iteration in case the other DBMS require special. Also, as there may be
> reservations about this feature, I think there ought to be a global
> switch and an individual :check opti
On Friday 17 April 2009, pedz wrote:
> I am also working / maintaining code that does foreign constraints,
> unique keys, etc.
Just wondering, does your code for uniqueness differ from unique
constraints? As far as I'm aware, defining a column as unique in SQL is
just a syntactic shortcut for a
I am also working / maintaining code that does foreign constraints,
unique keys, etc.
I'm hoping to get it back stable after moving up to Rails 2.3.2 this
weekend. I'll update this thread if I do.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:26, Ryan Bates wrote:
>
> I am building a Rails plugin which is somewhat similar to named scopes
> and therefore behaves like an array. However it isn't a subclass of
> Array
I see now that the current check is pretty ugly:
if Array === partial_path ||
(defined
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:09 AM, amichelins wrote:
> My question is :
> This feature is planing to be include as part of RoR in a future
> version or is discarted and it is out of the plans?
Try Dr. Nic's gem: http://compositekeys.rubyforge.org
Further questions should be directed to the rubyo
Hi :
I am new to RoR and i tring to migrate a web system from php to RoR.
When i start to read the docs of active record i find that not suport
is give to composite primary keys.
Finding in the forums, i find a extencion that makes it posible. But
each time you update the RoR it can stop work.
W
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Chad Woolley wrote:
> I'd like to see the CI build kept green through these efforts:
>
> http://ci.rubyonrails.org/builds/rails
Ah, it is green again. Nice :)
-- Chad
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you a
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> 2.3 application. We're obviously not done yet (by any stretch), but if
> you go through the new_base specs, I think you'll be pleased with our
> thoroughness.
>
> I'd be happy to answer any other questions you might have.
I'd like to see the
