[Rails-core] Rails 3 - bundle install : ffi 0.5.4 gem error - building with native extensions

2010-02-07 Thread Kristian Mandrup
kristian-mandrups-macbook-pro:demo_app kristianconsult$ bundle install Updating git://github.com/rails/rails.git Updating git://github.com/rails/arel.git Updating git://github.com/rails/rack.git Updating git://github.com/rspec/rspec.git Updating git://github.com/negonicrac/rspec-rails.git Updating

[Rails-core] New gem 'thor-ext' with addons and patches for updating the Gemfile

2010-02-07 Thread Kristian Mandrup
I know the code could be much improved, fx the add_gem has so far no support for an options hash. Perhaps this could be integrated into the original Rails::Generators::Actions in a new fork? I will also work on a 'txt-mutator' gem with a DSL for general-purpose code (text file) refactorings.

Re: [Rails-core] Rails 3.0 beta not tagged on GitHub

2010-02-07 Thread Mislav Marohnić
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 23:29, Mikel Lindsaar raasd...@gmail.com wrote: Generally release candidates are tagged, but the beta won't be. The current state of the beta is what is in the github repository right now. No. That's the current state of edge Rails. The current state of the

Re: [Rails-core] Rails 3.0 beta not tagged on GitHub

2010-02-07 Thread Jonas Nicklas
Agreed, I can't see any reason why it *shouldn't* be tagged. It's not like tags are a limited resource. /Jonas On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Mislav Marohnić mislav.maroh...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 23:29, Mikel Lindsaar raasd...@gmail.com wrote: Generally release candidates

Re: [Rails-core] Rails 3.0 beta not tagged on GitHub

2010-02-07 Thread Yehuda Katz
Jonas, Little did you know, but tags are a non-renewable resource. We must conserve our tags or soon there will be none left! In all seriousness, the tag is pushed ;) Yehuda Katz Developer | Engine Yard (ph) 718.877.1325 On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Jonas Nicklas

[Rails-core] Bundler and development server preferences

2010-02-07 Thread Andrew White
Playing around with the new Rails 3 beta and one thing that struck me is that to use mongrel as your local development server you need to specify the gem requirement in the Gemfile before the rails server command will notice. I know you can create a development group in the Gemfile that will

[Rails-core] Re: The state of mountable apps

2010-02-07 Thread mike
Thanks for the info! The new engine, router and rack stuff seems like a solid base! Again.. keep up the good work! :-) On 7 Feb., 08:19, Yehuda Katz wyc...@gmail.com wrote: In Rails 3.0, the Engine class is the superclass of Application. We got pretty far along, but there are some kinks that

Re: [Rails-core] Re: The state of mountable apps

2010-02-07 Thread Mikel Lindsaar
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:09 AM, mike mike.zasc...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks for the info! The new engine, router and rack stuff seems like a solid base! Again.. keep up the good work! :-) What you stumbled across is pretty much all in the lifo/docrails repository now. Watch out for more

Re: [Rails-core] Re: The state of mountable apps

2010-02-07 Thread Anuj Dutta
On 8 February 2010 09:47, Mikel Lindsaar raasd...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:09 AM, mike mike.zasc...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks for the info! The new engine, router and rack stuff seems like a solid base! Again.. keep up the good work! :-) What you stumbled across is

Re: [Rails-core] Re: The state of mountable apps

2010-02-07 Thread Chad Woolley
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Anuj Dutta dutta.a...@googlemail.com wrote: Check this out as well, by Jose Valim: https://gist.github.com/9fcf658fc4f559b97c2c It gives a good introduction and a brief insight into how Railtie, Engine, Application fits together in Rails3. That's a great