[Rails-core] 3.0.1 docs and existing objects

2010-10-15 Thread Espen Antonsen
My app relied on the security vulnerability fixed in Rails 3.0.1. While I did specify attributes such as name and email, my main goal was to use an existing record by specifying the id. The 3.0.1 patch does not make it possible to specify id in nested attributes. It now raises a raise_nested_attrib

Re: [Rails-core] Suggested solution for ticket #2350

2010-10-15 Thread hemant
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Luke Chadwick wrote: > Hi All, >   I updated > https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/2350-logtailer-ignores-configlog_path > a while back with a suggestion for how to create a patch for the > problem, and wanted to get someone to +1 t

Re: [Rails-core] Suggested solution for ticket #2350

2010-10-15 Thread Teng Siong Ong
I strongly disagreed with hemant. i recently just got a patch in without using any twitter DM, personal email or the guarded campfire chat room. If you are serious about your patch, try to ask rubyist around you to check out your patch and comment about it on the Lighthouse ticket. Remember, Rails

Re: [Rails-core] Suggested solution for ticket #2350

2010-10-15 Thread Ryan Bigg
Core team members have lives too. If you'd like a patch reviewed then send me an email at radarliste...@gmail.com and I will review it if the core team will not. On 16/10/2010, at 6:16, hemant wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Luke Chadwick > wrote: >> Hi All, >> I updated >> htt

Re: [Rails-core] Suggested solution for ticket #2350

2010-10-15 Thread Teng Siong Ong
me as well: siong1...@gmail.com. On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Ryan Bigg wrote: > Core team members have lives too. > > If you'd like a patch reviewed then send me an email at > radarliste...@gmail.com and I will review it if the core team will not. > > > > On 16/10/2010, at 6:16, hemant wro