[Rails-core] Functionality reduction? How to customize full_message for validation error using i18n in Rails 3?

Folks, I just posted a bug report about this: https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/6274-ability-to-specify-a-custom-translation-for-full_messages-gone-in-rails-3x The more I think about this, the more puzzled I am as to what the new convention for Rails 3 is to over

Re: [Rails-core] Replacement for AV::TestCase

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:32:11PM -0800, Nick Sutterer wrote: > Hey friends, > > here's a replacement for ActionView::TestCase, I called it > AV::HelperTest. In the commit I already changed all the existing > helper tests, they run fine with the new class. > https://github.com/apotonick/rails/com

[Rails-core] Replacement for AV::TestCase

Hey friends, here's a replacement for ActionView::TestCase, I called it AV::HelperTest. In the commit I already changed all the existing helper tests, they run fine with the new class. https://github.com/apotonick/rails/commit/f5bf2a06cf30cc621d6d1aef5aedc4659737b271 So, why a replacement? AV::T

[Rails-core] Can't use ActionDispatch::Request in Rails middleware because path_parameters get lost

Hi, I just encountered a bit of an issue where we call request.params of an ActionDispatch::Request inside a rack middleware right before a Rails 3.0.3 app. The issue is that the path_parameters never appear in the parameters hash if you call request.params before the rails app. It seems that th

Re: [Rails-core] Slow startup using ruby 1.9.2 vs 1.8.7

That bug was specific to certain situations, namely calling methods on named scopes or association proxies. There are certainly other fish to fry, I just wanted to address that one specific case. On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Ken Collins wrote: > > Agreed! > > Please do not let my aside o

Re: [Rails-core] Slow startup using ruby 1.9.2 vs 1.8.7

ko1 was looking for a sample app to reproduce the problem, http://osdir.com/ml/ruby-talk/2010-12/msg00350.html On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote: > There are things that the C require code does in 1.9 that slow things down. > One such example is re-checking $LOAD_PATH to make

Re: [Rails-core] Slow startup using ruby 1.9.2 vs 1.8.7

There are things that the C require code does in 1.9 that slow things down. One such example is re-checking $LOAD_PATH to make sure it is all expanded on every require. This is something that should be addressed by ruby-core. I'll open a ticket on redmine if there isn't one already. Yehuda Katz Ar

Re: [Rails-core] Slow startup using ruby 1.9.2 vs 1.8.7

SEEKING A GREAT WEB QA Engineer! Please let me know if you would be interested in speaking! Ken Collins wrote: Agreed! Please do not let my aside on 5410 distract the issue. 1.9.2 is still slow! - Ken 5410 should be fixed.. Do you believe that may be the cause of the slow startu

Re: [Rails-core] Slow startup using ruby 1.9.2 vs 1.8.7

Agreed! Please do not let my aside on 5410 distract the issue. 1.9.2 is still slow! - Ken >> 5410 should be fixed.. > > Do you believe that may be the cause of the slow startup using 1.9.2? > I believe that Ken Collins said that it made little difference for > him. -- You received this m

Re: [Rails-core] Slow startup using ruby 1.9.2 vs 1.8.7

On 10 January 2011 15:06, Stephen wrote: > 5410 should be fixed.. Do you believe that may be the cause of the slow startup using 1.9.2? I believe that Ken Collins said that it made little difference for him. Colin > > 1.9.2 has this new setup where you can implement a function > "responds_to_mi

Re: [Rails-core] Slow startup using ruby 1.9.2 vs 1.8.7

5410 should be fixed.. 1.9.2 has this new setup where you can implement a function "responds_to_missing" to deal with responds_to for functions that are handled by method_missing. ActiveRecord was removing all the default methods on the AssociationProxy object that didn't match a regular expressi

Re: [Rails-core] Slow startup using ruby 1.9.2 vs 1.8.7

I somewhat mentioned this [1] when I was running ActiveRecord tests under 1.9.2 vs 1.8.7. Someone else mentioned there was a bug fix [2] which I can see is applied to both 3-0-stable/2-3-stable. Even though after this, I still found 1.9.2 to be way slower. I never did the legwork to find out if

Re: [Rails-core] How to show the full resolution image at clicking on thumnail

Amrit, > I am new to this mailing list and this is my first post to this list. The rails/ruby core lists are not the place for general help. This particular list is dedicated to development of rails itself. I did see you had sent your message to rails talk which is the correct place and I am s

[Rails-core] How to show the full resolution image at clicking on thumnail

I am new to this mailing list and this is my first post to this list. I am working on the Ruby on Rails application (OpenStreetView).I need a help in the following issue. There are 5 copies of the same images are placed in a folder i.e. large(1024*768),medium(500* 375),small(240*180),thu mnail(75*7

[Rails-core] Slow startup using ruby 1.9.2 vs 1.8.7

There has been an ongoing thread [1] on the RoR talk list about startup time using Rails 3 with Ruby 1.9.2. Do not be confused by the subject of the thread, which mentions 1.9.1, it has moved on to 1.9.2. The gist is that on Ubuntu (and possibly Macs) the startup time when using 1.9.2 can be very