I am new to this mailing list and this is my first post to this list.
I am working on the Ruby on Rails application (OpenStreetView).I need a help
in the following issue.
There are 5 copies of the same images are placed in a folder i.e.
large(1024*768),medium(500*
375),small(240*180),thu
Amrit,
I am new to this mailing list and this is my first post to this list.
The rails/ruby core lists are not the place for general help. This particular
list is dedicated to development of rails itself. I did see you had sent your
message to rails talk which is the correct place and I am
I somewhat mentioned this [1] when I was running ActiveRecord tests under 1.9.2
vs 1.8.7. Someone else mentioned there was a bug fix [2] which I can see is
applied to both 3-0-stable/2-3-stable. Even though after this, I still found
1.9.2 to be way slower. I never did the legwork to find out
5410 should be fixed..
1.9.2 has this new setup where you can implement a function
responds_to_missing to deal with responds_to for functions that are
handled by method_missing.
ActiveRecord was removing all the default methods on the AssociationProxy
object that didn't match a regular
On 10 January 2011 15:06, Stephen sblackst...@gmail.com wrote:
5410 should be fixed..
Do you believe that may be the cause of the slow startup using 1.9.2?
I believe that Ken Collins said that it made little difference for
him.
Colin
1.9.2 has this new setup where you can implement a
Agreed!
Please do not let my aside on 5410 distract the issue. 1.9.2 is still slow!
- Ken
5410 should be fixed..
Do you believe that may be the cause of the slow startup using 1.9.2?
I believe that Ken Collins said that it made little difference for
him.
--
You received this
SEEKING A GREAT WEB QA Engineer!
Please let me know if you would be interested in speaking!
Ken Collins wrote:
Agreed!
Please do not let my aside on 5410 distract the issue. 1.9.2 is still slow!
- Ken
5410 should be fixed..
Do you believe that may be the cause of the slow
There are things that the C require code does in 1.9 that slow things down.
One such example is re-checking $LOAD_PATH to make sure it is all expanded
on every require. This is something that should be addressed by ruby-core.
I'll open a ticket on redmine if there isn't one already.
Yehuda Katz
ko1 was looking for a sample app to reproduce the problem,
http://osdir.com/ml/ruby-talk/2010-12/msg00350.html
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Yehuda Katz wyc...@gmail.com wrote:
There are things that the C require code does in 1.9 that slow things down.
One such example is re-checking
That bug was specific to certain situations, namely calling methods on
named scopes or association proxies. There are certainly other fish to fry,
I just wanted to address that one specific case.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Ken Collins k...@metaskills.net wrote:
Agreed!
Please do
Hi,
I just encountered a bit of an issue where we call request.params of
an ActionDispatch::Request inside a rack middleware right before a
Rails 3.0.3 app. The issue is that the path_parameters never appear
in the parameters hash if you call request.params before the rails
app.
It seems that
Hey friends,
here's a replacement for ActionView::TestCase, I called it
AV::HelperTest. In the commit I already changed all the existing
helper tests, they run fine with the new class.
https://github.com/apotonick/rails/commit/f5bf2a06cf30cc621d6d1aef5aedc4659737b271
So, why a replacement?
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:32:11PM -0800, Nick Sutterer wrote:
Hey friends,
here's a replacement for ActionView::TestCase, I called it
AV::HelperTest. In the commit I already changed all the existing
helper tests, they run fine with the new class.
Folks,
I just posted a bug report about this:
https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/6274-ability-to-specify-a-custom-translation-for-full_messages-gone-in-rails-3x
The more I think about this, the more puzzled I am as to what the new
convention for Rails 3 is to
14 matches
Mail list logo
