Hi José,
thanks, everything's working fine now! :)
Corin
Am 30.09.2011 18:01, schrieb José Valim:
Corin,
The problem in your case is that Rails 3.1.1 defined a new task called
environment inside the assets namespace, which is being called in your
example.
You can resolve the namespace
Hello!
I installed sprockets 2.0.1 and found that javascript_include_tag and
stylesheet_link_tag dont' support script and style files from public
folder anymore. If I use javascript_include_tag '/some-file-from-public.js'
I get error that file not found in assets paths.
Is it right behaviour? I
Hello, ¿I would like to know if there is any plans in the future to
allow specifying a path for the database.yml? I have several apps that
share a db and i think is a little redundant to have to copy the
database.yml to each, also the file is out of my repo and i dont like the
idea of using a
Why don't you put you them in the vendor/assets folder? Makes more sence
there than the public folder anyway
--
Wael Nasreddine
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 1, 2011, at 16:43, Alexei Vakhov vak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I installed sprockets 2.0.1 and found that javascript_include_tag and
It strikes me that a symlink is the appropriate solution to this problem.
You'd be doing it anyway with a standard Capistrano deployment.
Regards,
Ben Langfeld
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 4:14 PM, radhames brito rbri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, ¿I would like to know if there is any plans in the
This is what works for us:
config.database = ENV['DATABASE_YML'] # rails 3.0.x
config.paths['config/database'] = ENV['DATABASE_YML'] # rails 3.1
- Ketan
studios.thoughtworks.com | twitter.com/ketanpkr
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:14 AM, radhames brito rbri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, ¿I
Cool, I was hoping the Rack thing was still in play. So some initial
questions after looking at your Gist and reviewing Aaron's slides, but
before diving into the existing Rack API:
Technical:
- I like the clear separation of on the way in vs on the way out in
yours.
- Aaron's Filter
Thank you! This is good way. I missed the time then public folder is
completely obsolete.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Wael Nasreddine
wael.nasredd...@gmail.comwrote:
Why don't you put you them in the vendor/assets folder? Makes more sence
there than the public folder anyway
--
Wael
Exactly things like robots.txt still lives there
--
Wael Nasreddine
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 1, 2011, at 21:04, Alexei Vakhov vak...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you! This is good way. I missed the time then public folder is
completely obsolete.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Wael Nasreddine
You can still put assets in public/assets/ the thing is asset helper
methods included from sprockets are not documented. This is confusing
and we should fix it.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Alexei Vakhov vak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I installed sprockets 2.0.1 and found that
10 matches
Mail list logo