Keeping backwards compatibility and moving forward are contrary goals
pulling from each other. Rails tries to keep a balance while leaning
on the side of moving forward.
Some people like that, some people don't. There's no solution to that conflict.
Rodrigo I personally appreciate a lot your emai
On Thu, March 1, 2012 15:03, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
>
> I do respect their opinion. I just think I should state
> my opinion too so that their opinion don't become the
> only one.
I doubt that will ever be the case. There seems to be some
number of people that believe that Rails works we
hi,
until now, I was only a reader,
but this thread bother's me.
On Mar 1, 9:43 pm, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> From both articles, I've understood that they would prefer Rails to be
> more backward compatible in new releases.
I would prefer it. It's not only a rails issue, also a plugin
From both articles, I've understood that they would prefer Rails to be
more backward compatible in new releases.
I know you want to listen to their critics and that is exactly the
reason that I felt I should state that I prefer the API to be changed to
better in major releases instead of worry
Just to say that we shouldn't care when people try to offend, BUT even
if someone is doing that we should definitely listen to critics, try
to improve what is wrong and not being :emo: about that.
Anyway I didn't find any of the posts as personal attacks or bad
suited but perhaps is just me.
Chee
I discovered the bug is also with has_many items (contrary to my
original post.)
I've submitted this as a bug with test cases at
https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/5235
I'd appreciate guidance on that issue.
On Feb 23, 12:51 pm, James Coleman wrote:
> I've discovered what I'm pretty confide
Em 01-03-2012 16:59, James B. Byrne escreveu:
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 15:52, Rodrigo Rosenfeld
Rosas wrote:
I've been reading lots of articles criticizing Rails
in the last days.
What articles are those?
The most recent and famous ones are:
http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com/2012/02/rail
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 15:52, Rodrigo Rosenfeld
Rosas wrote:
> I've been reading lots of articles criticizing Rails
> in the last days.
>
What articles are those?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Har
Hehe, it should be the same with regards to its philosophy of keep
changing for better instead of avoid changes due to backward
compatibilities concerns.
Em 01-03-2012 16:48, Guilherme Dutra escreveu:
Did you mean that Rails would keep changing or would be the same? You
weren't clear about tha
One very in-elegant way of working around this obstacle would be to add
match 'assets/*:id', to: 'assets#serve'
to my config/routes.rb, add a helper to list all required assets in the
def asset_to_head(asset)
# write https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/3kyViXa_u8cJ.
To post
Rails 3.2.2 has been released. This release contains various bug fixes
and two important security fixes. All users are recommended to upgrade
as soon as possible.
## CHANGES
For information regarding the possible vulnerabilities, please see the
announcements here:
http://groups.google.com/g
Rails 3.1.4 has been released. This release contains various bug fixes
and two important security fixes. All users are recommended to upgrade
as soon as possible.
## CHANGES
For information regarding the possible vulnerabilities, please see the
announcements here:
http://groups.google.com/g
Rails 3.0.12 has been released. This release contains various bug fixes
and two important security fixes. All users are recommended to upgrade
as soon as possible.
## CHANGES
For information regarding the possible vulnerabilities, please see the
announcements here:
http://groups.google.com/
ditto!! Good job guys!
--
Joel Moss
Develop with Style at http://DevelopWithStyle.com
===
Call me +44 7791 503309
http://twitter.com/joelmoss
AIM: joelkmoss
Skype: joelmoss.info
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 15:52, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> I've been read
I've been reading lots of articles criticizing Rails in the last days.
I'd just like you to know there are lots of people that are actually
happy with the way Rails is currently doing.
I'm one of them.
I did find very valuable all the work put in Rails 3 and I find it much
better organized t
15 matches
Mail list logo
