[Rails-core] Re: ActiveRecord::Persistence.increment! requires a row lock to ensure isolated updates

2013-01-21 Thread Matt Huggins
Interestingly, ActiveRecord::CounterCache does this the appropriate way. https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/activerecord/lib/active_record/counter_cache.rb#L72 On Sunday, January 20, 2013 6:56:37 PM UTC-5, ajsharp wrote: The method is here:

Re: [Rails-core] Re: ActiveRecord::Persistence.increment! requires a row lock to ensure isolated updates

2013-01-21 Thread Alex Sharp
Interesting. Hopefully we can get an explanation as to why the increment methods are not done this way, and if the core team would be open to a patch. - Alex On Monday, January 21, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Matt Huggins wrote: Interestingly, ActiveRecord::CounterCache does this the appropriate way.

Re: [Rails-core] Transitive engine dependencies

2013-01-21 Thread Pavlo Shabat
what if you have to include engine dependency from git repository? On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 6:38:18 PM UTC+3, mschuerig wrote: On Wednesday 04 July 2012, Piotr Sarnacki wrote: Hi, You should require dependencies of an engine before initialization, for example in

[Rails-core] Set asset host port in a way similar to what application does

2013-01-21 Thread ChuckE
Concerning http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13266603/rails-how-to-set-port-number-for-the-asset-hosts-in-development I'm setting the full asset hosts in the environment files, being the one in development http://localhost:3000 . But let's say I restart the application on port 3001. Assets