Hello,
Having a boolean *.weekend?* on the Date class would be a good feature. It
will basically do this:
saturday? || sunday?
Makes the code cleaner and easier to read.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To unsubscribe f
Hi,
I would like to know if anyone see any disadvantages in allowing array in
segments constraints in addition to regexps. For example,
Photo::TYPES = %w(small big)get 'photos/:type', to: 'photos#index',
constraints: { type: Photo::TYPES }
my use case is that I usually have a model with a con
I use (and I know many others) uses the "/app" folder to add folder to
extend rails. Some examples would be FormBuilder subclasses, Decorators,
etc.
My problem is that app/{my_extension} pollutes the global namespace. I
would like to have app/form_builders use the FormBuilders namespace so I
c
Oh, I let the custom better_errors page fool me. The standard error page
does give a 404 for RecordNotFound (in 3.2, but I'm sure Rails 4 works as
well).
Sorry to bring this up before experimenting more, and thanks for pointing
me in the right direction.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Bob Bre
This is such an obvious tip that I am sure this has been discussed before.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Hector Bustillos <
hector.bustil...@crowdint.com> wrote:
> I was working a lot on performance improvements on rails apps when I
> realize that we always talking about ways to improve the p
I was working a lot on performance improvements on rails apps when I
realize that we always talking about ways to improve the page load of our
apps, basically ways to show things faster. One of those 'ways' is to
simple move the js include to the bottom of our page.
So, I got this questions why
This seems like a regression in 4.0.0. I believe that previous versions were
returning 404's for RecordNotFound in development.
--
Bob Breznak
@bobbrez
617 863 0262
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Henrik N wrote:
> Actually, RoutingError seems to do this already. I noticed the lack i
Hey all,
It seems that there is no real way to use parentheses in Rails' routing. As
far as I can tell, they can't be escaped to take away their "optional"
meaning. The grammar that Journey uses treat parentheses as reserved
characters, always.
This is an issue as it makes protocols like OData
As you can see here:
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/object/blank.rb#L55,
blank? is also implemented in FalseClass to always return true, so yes, it
was deliberate :)
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Amitav Mohanty
wrote:
> Hey
>
> On Wed, Jun
Hey
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Piotr Sarnacki wrote:
> While technically you could say that "false" is "present", it would be
> really unintuitive for most of the people as present? is supposed to be
> just opposite of blank? and is used to check for truthiness. Additionally
> present? is
10 matches
Mail list logo
