While we are on the subject of potential changes, I asked in a previous
thread about what's gonna happen to controller tests (functional tests in
previous parlance) and got no response. I am asking for two reasons: 1. It
was one of the proposed GSOC projects, so it is to be expected that someone
pi
I don't want to go into specifics because most of what I'm working on is
still high level ideas. I doubt that we'll see a separated persistence and
business logic layer land in Rails any time soon (though internally we're
actually becoming very close to that). However, we are continuing to break
As a follow up, Using accepts_nested_attributes for, I was able to bypass
this problem as I can take either :name of :name_attributes.
On Sunday, November 9, 2014 8:44:05 PM UTC-6, Patrick Blesi wrote:
>
>
> Currently strong_parameters do not allow you to overload keys in permitted
> parameters
The Rails team gladly awaits your benchmarks and Pull Requests to help make
that happen, Bráulio ;)
--
Kasper
> Den 25/11/2014 kl. 21.04 skrev Bráulio Bhavamitra :
>
> If I could suggest something, I would say: DOUBLE PERFORMACE
>
>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Jason Fleetwood-Boldt
>>
If I could suggest something, I would say: DOUBLE PERFORMACE
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Jason Fleetwood-Boldt <
t...@datatravels.com> wrote:
> Rails core,
>
> I was wondering if Rails 5 has a discussed (or proposed) roadmap? A
> growing chorus of developers are seeking ways to separate dom
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Jason Fleetwood-Boldt wrote:
I agree that as a framework there is no architectural mandate, and that the
> idea that there is one is a (too) common misconception. It is unfortunate
> that people coming to the framework do not have the perspective to know
> that (a
Got it, thanks.
I agree that as a framework there is no architectural mandate, and that the
idea that there is one is a (too) common misconception. It is unfortunate that
people coming to the framework do not have the perspective to know that (and in
turn create a lot of unsustainable code).
T
Rails comes with a default structure that serves well a ton of apps, but
does not mandate that you use that structure as is, which is a common
misconception/starting point in talks, posts, etc.
Those are the defaults, but of course projects can add their service
objects, form objects, decorators,
We don't have any roadmap yet besides the drop of support o Ruby 1.9.
About your specific question I believe it is unlikely we provide something
besides what we already provide with Active Model.
Rafael Mendonça França
http://twitter.com/rafaelfranca
https://github.com/rafaelfranca
On Tue, Nov 2
Rails core,
I was wondering if Rails 5 has a discussed (or proposed) roadmap? A growing
chorus of developers are seeking ways to separate domain logic from persistence
logic at the model level. I was wondering from a bird’s-eye perspective if the
framework plans to adopt patterns to make that e
10 matches
Mail list logo
