Re: [Rails-core] link_to_if/link_to_unless inconsistencies

I get that that's the way that it works, my point was that it's inconsistent. Right now you can't achieve the normal link_to behavior when the condition is met. We can preserve the behavior for the negative case and still get the content_tag block benefit for the positive case. On Thu, Nov 5,

Re: [Rails-core] link_to_if/link_to_unless inconsistencies

It would necessarily break backward compatibility with the positive condition, but that's the point that I'm making. If it's not going to be accepted that's fine, I was just hoping to understand why. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Rafael Mendonça França < rafaelmfra...@gmail.com> wrote: > If

Re: [Rails-core] link_to_if/link_to_unless inconsistencies

If that is possible without breaking backward compatibility go ahead, but I can't think in a way to make it backward compatible. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:00 PM Kevin Deisz wrote: > I get that that's the way that it works, my point was that it's > inconsistent. Right now

Re: [Rails-core] link_to_if/link_to_unless inconsistencies

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Kevin Deisz wrote: > Hi there, > > Seems like in the positive condition, link_to_if and link_to_unless are > inconsistent. When I send a block to link_to (or for that matter anything > else that calls content_tag) the block is used to

Re: [Rails-core] link_to_if/link_to_unless inconsistencies

It is the way they work. See the documentation. The block is used only when the condition is not met. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:26 PM Kevin Deisz wrote: > Hi there, > > Seems like in the positive condition, link_to_if and link_to_unless are > inconsistent. When I send a

[Rails-core] link_to_if/link_to_unless inconsistencies

Hi there, Seems like in the positive condition, link_to_if and link_to_unless are inconsistent. When I send a block to link_to (or for that matter anything else that calls content_tag) the block is used to determine the content in the case that "name" is not provided. It gets around this by